duendy said:hah...not surprised yer bored. you just think yerself yer just a load of chemicals init?
Ah, would that be the
.. talking duendy?
duendy said:hah...not surprised yer bored. you just think yerself yer just a load of chemicals init?
i don't know duendyduendy said:but this doesn't mean to see that consciousness is PRODUCED BY chemicals.
you have misunderstood soemwhat leo...leopold99 said:i don't know duendy
certain chemicals can indeed affect your consciousness
yes i agree. and nice to have you around for support...hehe. nice to meet you.bigal said:Guys...try some DMT or Psilocybe mushrooms. Kick the LSD.
me)))))hmmmwell, in a way you cannot now get kosher LSD, cause what it was origially cut with is very rare/hard to get apparently. but i have to say the LSD experinces i had years ago when 15--m first psychedelic experiences were utterly profound and life changing and turned me onto Nature, after paterns and culture had driven into me a big city semantic fukup--i u get me?
Treat it as a spiritual journey or quest and you will discover. Just mess around and get messy results. Either way, there's more to life than questioning and analysing since this can only involve our intellect. Our intellect is limited, but our feelings are infinite, they cannot be spoken or explained to the extent that they deserve.
It obviously cannot be that creation itself thought, " oh, let's just put that here and that there...."
It is an expression, an expression of itself.
if chemicals can affect conciousness doesn't that mean it is chemically related?duendy said:But this doesn't mean they PRODUCE consciousness
leopold99 said:if chemicals can affect conciousness doesn't that mean it is chemically related?
you might be confusing my meaning duendyduendy said:Your confusing 'affecting' . . .
ahhaha of course. but this doesn't mean chemcals PRODUCE consciousness.....leopold99 said:you might be confusing my meaning duendy
my meaning is
if chemicals can affect conciousness then conciousness is related to chemicals
that is my meaning
not at allduendy said:so i dont know hwy you persist wit this. i sense you are trying to claim tat chemicals someway produce consciousness, as in epiphemononalism. is that right?....
it's only 'paradox' if you see a dualism between consciousness and matter-energy, and/or claim either matter/energy or consciousness is more significant than one another.leopold99 said:not at all
frankly i do not see how chemical reactions can produce thought processes
but it must
so do you want to talk paradox?
Ophiolite said:a) No body was thinking about that Muslim.
b) What do you expect? This is sciforums, not the Royal Society