Is it wrong for someone to claim they respected Hitler for all he accomplished he made both good and bad?
Here is what I mean, Hitler was nobody and was even in jail where he wrote a bestselling book. He was released and in a very short time rose to become one of the most powerful men in the world and became a defining man in all of history. He created so many good things and help advance so much, but along with those good things he was committing genocide, which isn’t a bad thing if you’re not one of the people in line at the gas chambers.
So is it wrong to recognize him for the good things that were accomplished under his leadership?
*Note: I am using this question as a debate
Here is what I mean, Hitler was nobody and was even in jail where he wrote a bestselling book. He was released and in a very short time rose to become one of the most powerful men in the world and became a defining man in all of history. He created so many good things and help advance so much, but along with those good things he was committing genocide, which isn’t a bad thing if you’re not one of the people in line at the gas chambers.
So is it wrong to recognize him for the good things that were accomplished under his leadership?
*Note: I am using this question as a debate