I see we're on the subject of square circles and large rocks again.
How does putting two
words together, to create an
unimaginable concept, validly demonstrate that God is a paradox that can't be resolved? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that what you're trying to do? If the Pharaos didn't create upside down pyramids, does it mean they couldn't, wouldn't, or that there is no such thing?
An illogical statement does nothing to prove something (such as omnipotence), illogical.
You could just as well say: Can God create a black white, an up down or a two 50?
It's a strawman, as some here would say. Take any unknown variable and a known false, add a little boolean magic AND - et voila! The unknown becomes false. All bow to the omnipotence of Logic!
Just a few thoughts:
Something inconceivable is not
necessarily false.
The Archetypal Form comes
before the Type -
true creation originates from primary "source material" and intellectual principles.
A "rock larger than God" takes 1)a phenomenon already created and perceived (secondary - perceived - source) and 2)uses that reality as a leg to stand on to question its creator (primary - unperceived - source). There is no knowledge to be gained doing this. Maybe understanding, which is why we use logic as a tool, but no new knowledge.
If you spin a square fast enough, it does become a circle.
The Bible puts it this way:
Does the clay say to the potter, 'What are you making?' Does your work say, 'He has no hands'?
Isa.29
6 You turn things upside down,
as if the potter were thought to be like the clay!
Shall what is formed say to him who formed it,
"He did not make me"?
Can the pot say of the potter,
"He knows nothing"?
Not to mention the pot who once said "There is no potter! There is only clay!"
BTW. If you dig a hole deep enough, nothing stops you from building an inverted pyramid.