I hope you meant Tea ^_^
peace.
Yes, a not-empty bowl of chai tea granting energy for forces.
I hope you meant Tea ^_^
peace.
Yes, a not-empty bowl of chai tea granting energy for forces.
Rubbish!The fulfillment of Messianic Prophecy provides mathematical proof beyond any reasonable doubt that G-d exists.
Documented? Where?G-ds existence is documented and mathematically certain beyond rational question.
This thread was never meant to be taken seriously and is full of wise-ass remarks. It would be rather discriminatory to single out one particular troll for discipline.Rubbish! Documented? Where And you have a strange idea of the meaning of "mathematically certain". Why do you write it as G-d? You're not a sock of Anita Meyer are you? You seem to be as devoid as she when it comes to factual claims.
Love that band James . Those guys are the stuff right there. Can't you hear can't you hear the thunder. Better run , better take coverAh, sorry. I thought you were talking about the "Happy little vegemites" song:
We're happy little vegemites
As bright as bright can be
We all enjoy our vegemite
For breakfast lunch and tea
...
Can't remember how it goes, exactly...
The fulfillment of Messianic Prophecy provides mathematical proof beyond any reasonable doubt that G-d exists. All the known documentation of G-ds relationship with man were gathered together in one collection we call the Bible. G-ds existence is documented and mathematically certain beyond rational question.
Sure. A good place to start are books called "Science Speaks" and "Evidence that Demands a Verdict".Rubbish!
Documented? Where?
And you have a strange idea of the meaning of "mathematically certain".
Why do you write it as G-d? You're not a sock of Anita Meyer are you? You seem to be as devoid as she when it comes to factual claims.
Maybe a better place to start would be with reliable investigators...Sure. A good place to start are books called "Science Speaks" and "Evidence that Demands a Verdict".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Stoner#Critiques_of_Stoner.27s_apologetics.the author has fallen into the commonest error of using only these facts which bolster his hypothesis, and of discarding or controverting those which do not. For example, his discussion of the theory of evolution is not only misleading; it displays an abysmal ignorance of recent evolutionary studies
That's only when we're being polite. We have much more colorful names for them.And you wonder why we call theists irrational?
So, the proof of a notion described in this book is the fact that the book itself says it's true? And you wonder why we call theists irrational?
I think that if God existed he would answer my prayers. But he didn't so that's scientific proof that he doesn't.
I think that if God existed he would answer my prayers. But he didn't so that's scientific proof that he doesn't.
Not by anyone with at least 3 brain cells.Platypi were believed to have evolved from early ducks that lived in the water 24/7. or somethig like that.