GeoffP said:
What, they all used to do this? How would there be any daughters left to be step mothers? LOL. I think you're confusing the actions of a few pre-islamic arab extremists with an entire religion. Don't paint all pre-islamic pagan arabs with the same brush. Paganism is about peace - peace with each other and peace with the gods. One must ask why such sacrifices were made and understand the context in which they were offered. The people thought that the gods were angry, you see. It was a different time.
Sorry if this wasn't made clear... they didn't all do it, but it was acceptable by them, they feared that daughters would mean slavery and disgrace if they were to lose so, it was aceptable to kill them... this is historical fact of arab paganists... sorry, if i offended anyone it wasn't my inttention..
GeoffP said:
...does the contextual plea above look familiar?
I completely aid you, no text, religious or other should be dealt with without completly understanding the historical and cultural background of it... that is why we have an islamic coarse aiming to know that of the quran's verses and hadiths.
GeoffP said:
The only religion to enforce law? I beg your pardon?
sorry, again... i didn't ellaborate this more, it isn't the only religion to enforce law, it is the only with judaism that include religious contexts that mention how to deal with different crimes, others simply give it to the seculare authority to decide...
GeoffP said:
This is the exact nature of suicide bombing. How can you condemn something with one breath and support it in the next?
if u blow urselfup to protect ur village or during war against an army it would be understood, and sometimes even praised... but against civilians and non combatants its condemned in islam:
1- surat Al-Maeidah (the feast)verse 2 and verse 8 and verse 51
2- surat Al-Nisa' (the women) verse 60
3- surat Al-Baqara (the cow) verse 62
And in this last especially, u'll see that islam even respects others differences although it doesn't agree with their claims... now, if some stupid fanatics try to picture it otherwise its their problem not the whole community, like u can't blaim catholics for the crusade and spanish inquisitions, nor jews for zionist acts, nor communists for stalins regime ... etc
GeoffP said:
But in none of those other religions can you be legally killed for leaving them. You might well quote Deuteronomy back at me, but I don't expect you could find anyone being executed in Western society for converting or becoming secular. The same is of course not true for islamic nations. Can islam undergo a Reformation or not?
this was a habit not religion, this one of the major issues i discuss with our religious figures, to get astonished the prophet never killed anyone for leaving the religion!
GeoffP said:
Islamic society, however, places many more limitations on the rights of non-muslims. This in particular is what concerns me.
it is the same in catholism treating of jews and muslims in the middle ages, like spain, russia and some austria, still we treated them better... jews were known to aid muslims in invading other countries because they saw them as being better in treatment... during the abbasid era all sorts of religions were engaged in theological discussions and political debates..... so, we have alot in common, only we r going through a decline... its only just to give us time to get intouch with our civilized past!
GeoffP said:
This is not correct. The jizya associated with dhimmitude (the oppression or suppression of non-muslims in islamic regimes) ranged up to double those taxes paid by muslims (zakaat). In fact, in many cases in the Caliphate, zakaat was optional rather than obligatory. The collection of jizya was also intended to be "humiliating" and in some places in North Africa (and Turkey, I think) those paying jizya were smacked on the head after payment with a stick to reinforce the perception of subjugation. This is in line with the Quranic command to make the infidels (Jews, Christians, etc) "feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29) and "pay the jizya with both hands" etc.
you forgot "al-khums", but nevermind... alot of misundersatanding sorrounds jizya, some think it was for mere insult of non muslims... its alot like the israeli law which says jews and druze r entightled for military service while others r not... the islamic law says that a non muslim, since is a citizen shall enlist in the army or he can pay jizya instead whereas able muslim it is mandatory on them to inlist... hope things r clarified, if some rulers used jizya for their own purposes its there problem, umayyads reign use to put jizya on muslim non arabs (persians, indians,..etc) while exempting non muslim arabs...
GeoffP said:
So the murder of poetesses and the beheading of male captives is "defense"?
Mohammed needed somehow to attack other villages?
that poetess was also a military general and a leader of a tribe that was known for aiding murders on the tribal routes..."beheading"! the first beheading in islam occured during abu bakr's reign not the holy prophet... ur listening to some orientalist bullshit... look to ur sources before spilling accusations... please!
GeoffP said:
And are the rights of religious minorities equal to those of muslims in islam? May their churches be built as tall as or taller than mosques? May they repair churches (let alone synagogues) without the permission of the islamic authority? May muslims convert to other religions? Not fifty years ago, there was a sizeable proportion of Christians in many ME states - tell me, where did they go?
again ur insisting to mix tradition with religion, ottoman rule made that silly rule, they r the ones to be condemned not islam taking it from one of omar's ideas during his reign, not the prophet... and those christian communities u speak about simply decided they want to emigrate to south america and europe some muslims did too. specially in lebanon it is atradition to emigrate, we have a 4 million population with a 15 milion exodus, this is something about the poverty we had in thew fourth stage of the ottoman empire and the famine that spead due to economic reasons....
GeoffP said:
Neither are the Christians, really. The difference is that they don't burn down the embassies of islamic nations for the kind of bigoted vitriol that mosques churn out all over the ME, nor does their religion support such. "Turn the other cheek" is their rule, as I recall.
remember the number of mosques turned into churches in spain and portugal, and the demolished mosques in bosnia and kosovo... let alone the babari mosque in India... (sorry, this wasn't offensing anyone and i know alot of worship places of others were also demolished by muslims, but we weren't the only "vandals")
GeoffP said:
Unfortunately, that wasn't Mohammed's take on things.
If you only knew better...... try reading about mohammad in muslim sites
http://www.islamway.com/mohammad