elsyarango
Registered Member
I'm taking this argument over from a different thread to see how people here interpret the definition of the term atheism.
My argument is that the definition of the term "atheism" as presented by the infedel website is a misconception.
My argument is that the proper definition of the term "atheism" describes those who accept as true the proposition, "gods do not exist".
Theism: Those who accept as true the proposition, "gods exist".
Atheism: Those who accept as true the proposition, "gods do not exist".
My argument is that these are the proper standards that people in all areas of academics and otherwise use for the the term "atheism".
However, I noticed that many people online believe that the definition for the term "atheism" as presented by the infedel website is the proper standard use for the term.
They argue that all who do not believe that gods exist (including those that do not accept the proposition that "gods do not exist") fall under atheism. I argue that this is a misconception for the use of the term "atheism".
I argue that the proper definition for the term "atheism" describes only those that hold true the proposition that gods do not exist. None of the others fall under atheism. Not agnostics. Not anybody. Atheism is and only is meant to desceibe those who accept that there are no gods.
What about those that do not believe there are are gods, but don't necessarily believe there are no gods?
According to the proper definition of atheism, they are not atheists.
The infedels website defines them as atheists. My argument is that the infedels website incorrectly presents the definition of the term "atheism".
My argument is that the definition of the term "atheism" as presented by the infedel website is a misconception.
My argument is that the proper definition of the term "atheism" describes those who accept as true the proposition, "gods do not exist".
Theism: Those who accept as true the proposition, "gods exist".
Atheism: Those who accept as true the proposition, "gods do not exist".
My argument is that these are the proper standards that people in all areas of academics and otherwise use for the the term "atheism".
However, I noticed that many people online believe that the definition for the term "atheism" as presented by the infedel website is the proper standard use for the term.
They argue that all who do not believe that gods exist (including those that do not accept the proposition that "gods do not exist") fall under atheism. I argue that this is a misconception for the use of the term "atheism".
I argue that the proper definition for the term "atheism" describes only those that hold true the proposition that gods do not exist. None of the others fall under atheism. Not agnostics. Not anybody. Atheism is and only is meant to desceibe those who accept that there are no gods.
What about those that do not believe there are are gods, but don't necessarily believe there are no gods?
According to the proper definition of atheism, they are not atheists.
The infedels website defines them as atheists. My argument is that the infedels website incorrectly presents the definition of the term "atheism".
Last edited: