Holocaust Industry = Hate Speech?

Status
Not open for further replies.
kira said:
Gee, can't wait few more hours, eh? bugeye: James already said that he makes a poll to see other mods' opinion, in which if the vote results:
> 2/3: she'll be permanently banned
< 2/3: she'll be banned for 1 month

Some hours ago I've already PM SAM that if she is banned, I'll also leave. Not because I disagree with James' decision, but because I'd be sad posting here after SAM permanently banned. However, I guess few pages ago SAM already appologizes, so I hope James will drop it. If not, just wait some more hours, why don't you bugeye: Otherwise, just put her on ignore :shrug:
Click to expand...

Ah kira, kira, kira
smiley_hug.gif


You should stay. You're a comfortable Muslim, they can forget you are one most of the time and you don't threaten their comfortable self delusions. :D

Besides, it would leave Muslim as the only other obvious representative here of Islam. Thats not good at all!!!!
 
Not sure really, apparently there are standard definitions for what words mean and then there are other ones which have completely different implications. Neither of which make sense. So I am all at sea here. But there is some anti-Americanism, some Jews, some Holocaust denial and just for the topping, Muslims who lie.

I think

The cover story is that anyone who selectively quotes only a point of view which they support are bigots but if the selective quote is supporting victims of American wars, they could be Americans, me or Gandhi, we would all be bigots. Anyone of us. Or anyone else. However this is also libel because it is not meant to imply that it applies to anyone who supports victims of war.

Or something like that./

I'm not sure what selective quotation means since it seems to imply - posting a point of view you agree with. But I could be mistaken. ESL after all.
 
I think I should make these points to be very clear on this: I don't know what James wants from this forum, I doubt any of you do either, but SAM NEEDS to be permabanned for her own good, she try to leave before, but her addiction is too strong, look at her, she so god dam addicted she got ~65k post, 50 posts a fucking day! SAM needs help, banishment will do her good, she can move on with her life, maybe make a forum of her own. And it does not matter to sciforums if she leaves, others will come and replace her, others will come and replace kira, end of story.
 
Thanks its on the 28th I was supposed to go to London but I don't feel like braving the snow, agh!

Love the noob smiley.
 
Ahhhh Kira. I thought we were so far above trolling that we were going to avoid any off topic or inflammatory posts, good to know you stick by your principles.....
 
ElectricFetus said:
I think I should make these points to be very clear on this: I don't know what James wants from this forum, I doubt any of you do either, but SAM NEEDS to be permabanned for her own good, she try to leave before, but her addiction is too strong, look at her, she so god dam addicted she got ~65k post, 50 posts a fucking day! SAM needs help, banishment will do her good, she can move on with her life, maybe make a forum of her own. And it does not matter to sciforums if she leaves, others will come and replace her, others will come and replace kira, end of story.
Click to expand...

I don't think I am significant here, but thanks
 
S.A.M. said:
Thanks its on the 28th I was supposed to go to London but I don't feel like braving the snow, agh!

Love the noob smiley.
Click to expand...

Yeah, here is also snowy. Last weekend was the coldest day of the year in Germany. During the day it was -9 degrees in DUisburg, in the night it was -15. If I recall correctly from the news, in London it was somewhat warmer. Have fun with the snow! Here is already melting.

shichimenshyo said:
Ahhhh Kira. I thought we were so far above trolling that we were going to avoid any off topic or inflammatory posts, good to know you stick by your principles.....
Click to expand...

SOmetimes I just forgot about it, how did I end up with snow and such :eek:
 
James R said:
The opening poster of that thread was banned for one week. The thread was unacceptable.

It is untrue that I had "no problem" with the thread. I left it open because I had posted comments in it and wanted to give a right of reply. Following SAM's lies about me, and my issuing of a demand for an apology from her, I left it open a little longer to give her an opportunity to do the honourable thing and apologise for her blatant and hurtful lie. When she started this thread, I closed it.
Click to expand...

Here's your first post on that thread, your quotes in Blue.

Originally Posted by fellowtraveler
Promoting religious agendas that always and only find fault with the USA and our allies. This is exactly what S.A.M. does all day every day.
Click to expand...
”
True.
Click to expand...

“
I am going to have my say here.
Click to expand...
”
You already have been.
Click to expand...

“
This person is a dedicated enemy of the USA.
Click to expand...
”
Yes. I'm sure she'll happily admit that.
Click to expand...

“
Is this forum dedicated to the destruction of the USA ?
Click to expand...
”
Well, it's not forum policy.
Click to expand...

“
Originally Posted by S.A.M.
Don't worry, the admin here is pro-white, pro-US, pro-Israel, pro-Jew, pro-atheist, pro-west and anti-Muslim.
Click to expand...
”
SAM's real issue is that the admin refuse to join her crusade, which is, of course, anti-white, anti-US, anti-Israel, anti-Jew, anti-atheist, anti-West, and pro-Muslim.
Click to expand...
Anybody who disagrees with SAM on anything gets all of the quoted labels applied to them automatically by SAM. She is hopelessly biased.
Click to expand...

This was your first post in that thread. You respond to FT's OP as if it was OK. You mock it, rather gently, but make no mention of any problems you might have with the thread title or OP.

SAM is the focus of a clear critique. From there your focus is on SAM.

So when I said 'It seems' like the moderator had no problem with the OP/title, I was on good ground. I was not making a claim to mind reading.
 
Last edited:
SAM has not apologised.

The moderators have not voted with a 2/3 majority to ban her permanently.

Therefore, she is banned for 1 month.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top