Getting back to the matter of banning Kremmen for
either insulting another member (and not employing the acceptable mode of insult: the simile)
or accusing a member of malfeasance (in this case, willful deception), what about Cosmic?
The following post can be interpreted in (at least) three manners:
I accept that [apology] but it wasn't needed for I just let things like that slide off my back.
1. Cosmic is attempting to deceive
Fraggle here, as he quotes the entirety of Fraggle's post:
Fraggle
You obviously didn't do your homework before insulting Cosmic, even after he took the unusual measure of introducing the real person behind his screen name and showing us his photograph.
This dog is already in the Guinness Book of Records.
You have been banned for one day for violating the rule against insulting another member.
Cosmic, please accept this apology on behalf of SciForums.
which would suggest that he had in fact
read it, but he makes no attempt to clear up the matter of mistaken identities and thereby furthers the deception--a bannable offense, yes?
2. Or, although he quotes Fraggle in entirety, he makes no effort to, uh,
comprehend what Fraggle had written, which suggest flagrant disrespect--is
that a bannable offense?
3. Or, he is simply functionally illiterate--probably not a bannable offense, but it sure as hell
ought to be.
Just tryin' to understand all these rules and shit.