Great Dane is 7ft long, weighs 270 Lbs. and is the world's biggest dog

Seems a bit heavy handed. I mean a ban, for that? Having a bad day are we?
He accused Cosmic of perpetrating a hoax by posting a photoshopped picture and claiming that it was real. I might have let that slide, except for the fact that if you Google "world's tallest Great Dane" or any combination of words that refer to this dog, you'll get an avalanche of hits. This photo has been posted in respectable newspapers, and the dog is in the Guinness Book of Records. And you can learn that by just reading the teasers in the Google list, without having to click on any of them.

If you're going to call someone a liar and a perpetrator of hoaxes, you had better do your homework first. Otherwise, it is a personal insult against another member, which is indeed a rule violation.
do you agree on capt's ban by fraggle in your forum?
Several moderators spoke up about this and they unanimously disagreed with my action. However, most of them did not think that an insult had not occurred, merely that it was perhaps not quite bad enough to merit a ban. Another thought I was punishing him just for being wrong. Nonetheless they all thought I was within my rights to issue the ban, merely being too rigorous.

The general feeling was that if we start enforcing the rules that rigorously, we'll be doling out one-day bans to half the members, and it would be more work than the unpaid volunteer part-time moderators could handle. My response to that is that if we'd just get down to business and start enforcing the rules that rigorously, we might see a vast improvement in the civility of the discourse around this website, as befits one that is supposed to be a place of science and scholarship. And we'll end up with less work.
Is it just me, or does anyone else get the impression that, uh, several posters within this thread are experiencing some serious difficulties in reading comprehension?
I guess I can't complain about that detail. I started it by not understanding that it wasn't Cosmic's dog.
Insulting another member? Rubbish!
You accused him twice of posting a Photoshopped picture and trying to pass it off as genuine. That's an insult where I come from.
Fraggle: (thinking ) -- If Cosmic was posting a quote, he would have put quotation marks around the sentence. -- He hasn't. Therefore the dog is Cosmic's dog. -- Cosmic owns the biggest dog in the world. He sits with Cosmic on his sofa. -- That Kremmen is insulting Cosmic. -- Worse, he is insulting Cosmic's dog.
I readily confess to being drawn into this thread because I'm a dog lover. I also readily confess that I was confused by the absence of quotation marks. I accept the fact that you were not insulting Cosmic for claiming that he personally owns the world's tallest dog, because you weren't led astray by the punctuation error. Nonetheless, you were insulting Cosmic for claiming that the picture he posted was of the world's largest dog, and you accused him of perpetrating a hoax. That's still an insult and it's still a rule violation.

If I had known that it wasn't Cosmic's dog, perhaps I would not have bothered with the ban. But now that it's done neither I nor any of the other moderators believe that it should be reversed, since you did in fact insult another member.

As I said above, perhaps you (and all the other members who are reading this) will think twice next time before making such a serious accusation without checking your facts first.
When Fraggle issued his extravagant apology on behalf of the whole of sciforums, did you not notice that you hadn't been insulted at all.
Do you expect everyone you insult spuriously to be as benign about it as he was? Next time just do your own homework. Don't be so lazy.
When you are banned, you have no means of defending yourself.
What do you call this series of posts? You have turned an interesting thread about dogs into a whine fest about poor little you.

* * * * I wonder if I've collapsed two posts into one and am responding to the wrong person. If so, please change "you" to "him" etc. Sorry, I the day is ending and I have to close this so I can't fix it right now. * * * *
It's a kangaroo court without even the semblance of a trial.
The consensus of the moderators was that this ban was not undeserved, merely unusual.
Fraggle you are a clever man, no doubt, but sometimes you can't understand things which wouldn't puzzle a seven year old.
Fortunately I don't run into those kinds of things in real life. If it starts to happen more often here, I'll have to improve my skill at dealing with children.
By saying what I did I thought he would remove your ban but I see he didn't . Welcome back anyway, 1 day wasn't to bad even though it was wrong in many ways.
By the time I got back here, the ban was about to expire so there was no point. Unlike some of our members I have a real life to attend to out in the carbon world. If it were longer than one day I would have checked for feedback and responded appropriately.

Again I apologize to you because you're feeling guilty over something that was done on your behalf without your consent. Next time I'll be more careful. Sometimes a learning experience is the best that can come out of a bad situation.
frag should be restricted to moderating linguistics
We all help Enmos out because this is a high-traffic subforum and it's not easy for one person to handle it.
the guy is making a mockery of our standards . . . .
Au contraire. I am enforcing the standards that we already have. This is supposed to be a place where people come to learn, not to see the members throwing poop at each other like chimpanzees.
. . . . and making all of us look like fools.
That is unfortunately so easy that sometimes it's almost unavoidable.
we are tired of all these bogus bans executed by your feeble/malicious minds
Even though I scored 140 on the Mensa test, I'll let that personal insult go by without issuing another ban. I don't promise to do the same next time.
fight to get the infraction removed -- these idiots will happily let it remain and have it count towards a permaban
No. It's got too high a profile and too many moderators have been involved. We won't let that happen.
they do not apologize
I'm not apologizing. He broke the rules by insulting another member and he was banned for it. You kids need to grow up and stop acting like middle-school.
Ok, lets get back to the topic of the thread. If you want to discuss any unresolved issues about Captain Kremmen's ban you can open a thread in SF Open Government about it.
Works for me. After the last time I went to that board and discovered a thread named after me, I vowed never to return. ;)
 
.Works for me.

what the fuck are you talking about?

|| Ok, lets get back to the topic of the thread. If you want to discuss any unresolved issues about Captain Kremmen's ban you can open a thread in SF Open Government about it.


enmos, the mod of this forum specifically asks us to go to sfog if we continue in this vein. you shit all over the request. show some goddamn respect towards your colleagues

if their consensus is that you are being heavy handed, conform to the less onerous standard. resolve shit in favor of the community rather than your pathological sensibilities

our standards are neither hostile or antagonistic towards the community
you however seem to delight and favor the punitive approach rather than a reasoned argument

stay in your forum. you are neither a admin or super-mod. you do not have sitewide jurisdiction. the only option you have is to ban and it seems you easily settle for that

furthermore posturing as some goddamn elder and talking down to us "children" is a really snarky insult and wholly unwarranted. get the fuck out of sci if you have such a uncharitable and evil take on this community

why the fuck are you creating so many waves? go get a goddamn hobby and leave us the fuck alone.

we don't need a goddamn elder preaching the word to us "children"

you do not get to determine who feels insulted. do not project your pathology on to others. if cosmic did not report or initiate a complaint, you have no business moderating the dialogue

just because you can does not mean you have to

"chimpanzees"?
fucking apologize, you freak!!
 
Last edited:
Such serious accusations! Next time someone ACCUSES ME of posting a photoshopped photo, I just may fire up my lawyer.
 
stacks-richard-chimpanzee-with-hat-and-glasses-and-a-pipe.jpg

Chimpanzees? He insults us Chimpanzees? Even I knew it wasn't Cosmic's Dog.
 
Fraggle:
This is supposed to be a place where people come to learn, not to see the members throwing poop at each other like chimpanzees.

*Chimpkin flings poop*
 
I think this dog could easily take on a bear or a tiger.
I also think the owner is worried when he has to go to work and leave that dog with his wife lol.

I hope that when you get back from your banning (for "general idiocy"), that you don't use this thread to complain.
This thread is about undeserved bans.

Oh, and big dogs as well.
 
Last edited:
what the fuck are you talking about?




enmos, the mod of this forum specifically asks us to go to sfog if we continue in this vein. you shit all over the request. show some goddamn respect towards your colleagues

if their consensus is that you are being heavy handed, conform to the less onerous standard. resolve shit in favor of the community rather than your pathological sensibilities

our standards are neither hostile or antagonistic towards the community
you however seem to delight and favor the punitive approach rather than a reasoned argument

stay in your forum. you are neither a admin or super-mod. you do not have sitewide jurisdiction. the only option you have is to ban and it seems you easily settle for that

furthermore posturing as some goddamn elder and talking down to us "children" is a really snarky insult and wholly unwarranted. get the fuck out of sci if you have such a uncharitable and evil take on this community

why the fuck are you creating so many waves? go get a goddamn hobby and leave us the fuck alone.

we don't need a goddamn elder preaching the word to us "children"

you do not get to determine who feels insulted. do not project your pathology on to others. if cosmic did not report or initiate a complaint, you have no business moderating the dialogue

just because you can does not mean you have to

"chimpanzees"?
fucking apologize, you freak!!

Having a bad day Gus?
 
Dogs have been our companion animal for a considerable time. We love to compare details about our pets, as much so as if they were our own children, it seems. As this thread is about the biggest dog in the world (at the time of posting), I thought it might also be of interest to show an image of a very large litter of puppies

.
article-1161416-03DB19D0000005DC-756_468x447.jpg


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...er-Dalmatian-pups-takes-EIGHTEEN-walkies.html

I wonder how many spots are to be observed on 18 Dalmation puppies..... :D
 
Here's some information on the health of Great Danes.
They don't live very long unfortunately.

Great Danes, like most giant dogs, have a fairly slow metabolism. This results in less energy and less food consumption per pound of dog than in small breeds. Great Danes have some health problems that are common to large breeds, including gastric dilatation-volvulus (GDV) (a painful distending and twisting of the stomach). This is a critical condition that can affect Great Danes and other deep-chested breeds, and which may cause death if not quickly addressed. Drinking large amounts of fluid in a short period of time can provoke GDV in Great Danes, as well as other larger breeds of dogs. It is a commonly recommended practice for Great Danes to have their stomachs tacked (Gastropexy) to the right abdominal wall if the dog or its relatives have a history of GDV, though some veterinary surgeons will not do the operation if the actual sickness has not occurred. Elevated food dishes are often believed to help prevent GDV by regulating the amount of air that is inhaled while eating, although one study suggests that they may increase the risk.....

.............Breed clubs health surveys in the UK and US put the average life span of Great Danes at 6.5 to 7 years.

(From Wiki)

If you want longevity from a dog, choose a miniature poodle.
17 years and over is not a rarity.

Here's a site that tells you why people have more trouble with small dogs than big ones. The answers may surprise you. It's because people allow small dogs to act like pack leaders. Well worth a read.

http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/articles/smalltoydogs.htm
 
Last edited:
I know a woman who was breeding Great Danes here in the Yukon and the life expectancy of the breed is quite accurately portrayed in the information you cite, by the animals which I observed.

It is an important thing to consider, the life expectancy of a companion animal, and there may be reasons for choosing either of a short or long-lived pet. If we are in a stable situation, we may prefer a long-lived pet. At times our circumstances may suggest that having a pet with a shorter duration may be for the better. One example is that as we age, if we own long-lived pets, someone will need to care for them once we are gone. For that reason, many seniors who would otherwise love to have a companion animal forgo the temptation as they do not wish to leave a burden for others.

There is also the consideration that some pets find it very difficult to adapt to the change when their beloved owner of long duration, suddenly returns no more...
 
I said, "like chimpanzees." Go back and review your class notes on the simile.


and that is precisely why frag is unfit to moderate
like a senile and disingenuous old coot, he makes up shit as he goes
like some retarded jackass, he cannot quite comprehend the implications of his pronouncements

no matter
he is a mod
he establishes an acceptable standard of discourse
we shall follow

that quote will be my sig
ja, tis the dawn of a new era



--------------------------------------------------------------------

I said, "like chimpanzees." Go back and review your class notes on the simile. (Fraggle Rocker)
 
Back
Top