Then scrap wave functions! I basically copied the characteristics of aether waves from wave functions.
Except that those mainstream models which include wave functions, such as quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, are not aether models. Calling a dog a cat doesn't make the dog into a cat, even if they both have 4 legs, fur and a tendency to piss on things.
Like I said in a recent post, time and distance are measured by EM frequency of the Caesium atom. One second is 9 billion cycles of a 9GHz frequency. It was brilliant of scientists to think of this. Then I realized that the EM spectrum is filled with frequencies, 27 orders of magnitude of frequencies. What could be a more fundamental clock and measuring stick then an EM spectrum?
And I already explained to you why your 27 orders of magnitude was flawed too.
Oh well, thank god for that because no one in the research community
thinks, we just spend our days sticking Skittles up our noses and watching Oprah
You require that aether medium waves must be made of energy is some way;
You mean "I" there since your 'you' refers to other people and, as already explained many times, other people don't have the same narrow minded lack of imagination and competency as you.
But there is no reason why aether medium waves cannot be made of energy organized in some other way.
And there's no reason it all couldn't be invisible fairies but that doesn't make something unfalsifiable science.
You completely failed to attack the target. The target was: aether medium waves. You missed, you get an F.
Because I've already explained numerous times why your assertions are false, your logic contradictory and your maths laughably bad. My post was to respond to your comments about how anything other than talking about aether is an ad hom. It isn't, you just don't want to listen.
Why would the aliens bother talking to people who cannot understand a simple common sense approach to physics?
I've already given an example of how your own logic is false so you're not exactly Mr Perfect in that regard. Furthermore, speaking as someone who actually does physics rather than just hallucinate about aliens, I can tell you that there are things in the universe which do not follow common sense. I've already explained why common sense is short hand for a particular kind of bias. The fact you cannot grasp that sticking to 'common sense' is flawed on several levels just shows how narrow minded you are.
Your own reasoning about common sense and your beliefs are self contradictory! How much more blatant a problem do you need?
What do relativity and quantum mechanics have in common?
Their governing equations can both be formulated in terms of Bianchi identities on a fibre bundle.
Oh sorry, were you looking for some vapid arm waving response? I sometimes forget people don't know physics.
Why should aliens come down and talk to you when you can't even answer a simple basic question (after being told the answer repeatedly)?
Where to start.....
1. Demonstrate aliens have contact with humans.
2. Demonstrate they provide information to some humans.
3. Demonstrate they picked
you.
If they flew light years to convey physics information to us why would they pick you, someone with the maths skills of a bad high school student and with absolutely no practical experience of any physics? You're functionally innumerate, not very well read, without any experience of experiments and completely ignorant of the current state of human knowledge. So if you want to start listing reasons why aliens wouldn't speak to various people your list is going to be the longest.
That's the stupid part. You're not dumb if you don't know the answer. Your dumb if you don't recognize the answer after it's been told to you for 3 months.
Wow, I love the irony. You just demanded people tell you aether waves aren't needed, only to have several people comment about how you've been told that for months! Furthermore I've been explaining to you time and again how your own views are contradictory and your assertions demonstrably false and yet you keep repeating them.
There are people here who don't have college degrees who can identify the answer.
And when they can demonstrate they actually have viable information which leads to working models, demonstrating their accuracy, then they'll be listened to. Until then claims of "Aliens told me!" should be treated like every other "Aliens told me!" claim, like they are ****ing
wacko.
Why would ET show up at your tea parties to discuss warp drive physics when you treat people like crap? You are not friendly! You are not even logical.
While my persona is a matter of personal opinion whether or not I'm logical is not a matter of opinion. I've demonstrated your own views are inconsistent and you refuse to respond. I'm actually quite a friendly pleasant guy when I am dealing with people I like and/or respect. When it comes to discussing physics people gain my respect in a number of ways. Showing they are extremely capable mathematicians/physicists being the most obvious. The other is showing they are intellectually honest. This doesn't require them to know any physics or maths, they just have to be honest, open minded and rational. None of those adjectives apply to you. You've become more and more dishonest, dodging questions and refusing to face up to blatant, irrefutable demonstrations of your inconsistencies.
Would aliens fly across the galaxy to come to talk to me? Probably not. Am I the pinnacle example of humanity and thus deserve to be its representative? Not even close. Am I more informed, capable and familiar with maths and physics than you? Damn right.
I'm sorry you don't like being told your views are demonstrably inconsistent. I'm sorry you view being told your work is unscientific because it's unjustified, provides no model, has no logical derivation etc but that's a fact. It isn't an ad hom, I am not saying "It's not science because I don't like you", it's not science because it fails
every single criteria which is attached to the notion of science. My comments about
you then follow from the way in which you handle being told these things. Were you being dishonest when you just asked "Someone tell me aether waves aren't necessary!"? Yes, because I and others have spent many pages doing just that. Are you being hypocritical when you call me illogical while you simultaneously ignore how your 'common sense' assertion that everything which exists was a cause is inconsistent with your belief in god. Yes. Are you making your claims indistinguishable from the ravings of someone with a mental illness when your only 'justification' is "God and aliens told me". Yes.
If you don't like being told your claims are not science I suggest you stop making them because there's no way to make them science. Even if someone did your experiment and it gave a result in line with your claims it wouldn't mean you have a scientific theory. The fact you don't realise this is a significant contributor to your problem.