I've read the bible (supposedly the word of god).
Everything after that was admitted as written by men.
So where's the problem?
Wasnt written by god lol!
Did I say it wasn't?
I'm questioning why you claim I'm uneducated on the subject when ONLY the bible is (supposedly) written by god.
After that everything was written by men - with their own agenda.
So why should I believe their opinion?
i dont need to justify anything to you. Maybe you just cant accept i have found some meaning in my life. Stop trying to convience me against something i believe. You believe what you like, i respect your beliefs.
Don't have any, and you've shown little respect: spouting "god this" "god that" at me.
Just read about it a bit more and make your arguments more effective.
MORE effective?
When you haven't answered even ONE yet?
Its seems like you need to argue more than me so mine can be as pathetic as i want. Ive read both sides see the logic in both but just choose the one thats true to me. There is a lot of hate on this forum. Makes me laugh at satans ridiculous attempts to get to me. Please read up.
Get real: you start posting on a science forum, and you start your SciForums "career" with demonstrable nonsense and then accuse
me of trying to convince
you?
I know what it means, after i tell you and youve looked at a wikipedia article?
Arrogance in action.
Why should I
A) bother with Wiki or
B) wait for you to tell me (especially since I castigated you BEFORE you said what it meant)?
I had an education - simple Latin phrases are easy.
Failure to think, again.
Actually my faith is devoted to this angel as i had a near death and was rescued by him.
You can prove this or was it just oxygen starvation?
That's true - they're not supposed to be arrogant.
Oh wait, there WAS one wasn't there...?
At what?
Spelling, grammar and thinking (and eristic behaviour - in itself the aneristic fallacy, as Eris tells us), evidently not.
What else?