It Should Never Come to Earth on Hell
It's a Great Photo, But ....
A very simple question for KWHilborn:
I did receive my third ban in over a decade on this thread because the Tiassa the Racist Moderator (has called me Whitey, etc.) lacked the intelligence to comprehend what square brackets meant when I altered a quote to inform that the stolen goods (Jewelry) were returned to above mentioned Theft victim.
Tiassa admits to being in a Race Riot in 1991 at a Jesuit school and claims to have thrown Molotov Cocktails and used a weapon on someone (does this mean stabbed or shot?). This moderator has also set more buildings (plural) on fire. I think the Moderator needs to be reported to the FBI. The ban was ridiculous, but this Tiassa guy might be guilty of serious offences ....
....
Maybe we can help them put a name to a face. Jesuit School in 1991 I believe you suggested? That should help them narrow it down ....
.... Did you intentionally write buildings as plural. WTF! Who sets more than one building on fire? I think one is a lifetime limit although most sane people try to set ZERO buildings on fire ....
.... Yes. Fine example for us all apparently ....
.... So. Tell us about your childhood. EEK!
Anyway, are you one of those Canadians for whom English is a second language? Or, maybe, third?
The only reason I ask is that it makes a difference in how one should respond to the sort of abysmal post that relies entirely on praising its author for being illiterate gutter muck in order to have any whiff of credibility.
What I
do appreciate about the post ... well, okay, two things:
(1) That's a great picture. From which third-rate internet backwater did you find it? Oh, right. I'll just look at the link. Ah, yes, one of those pop culture sites that does the thinking for you so that you don't have to decide what's cool. How predictable. Then again, it really is a fun shot.
(2) Thank you for reminding everyone why they really shouldn't bother with your posts. I mean, sure, the stinking, ranting old man on the street corner is one we teach our children to avoid, but that's just one of those precautionary measures. Most of those drooling, would-be prophets are generally harmless, and what makes them dangerous is a person determined to go out of his way to start something. Given how ill-conceived such plans usually are, it's a really, really stupid way to go about things. And you have provided for our neighbors and future generations of Sciforums members a sterling example of what it looks like when an angry, ranting, would-be prophet gets up on his soapbox without a clue where reality lies.
There is
nothing anyone can say that can injure your argument as badly as, well, your own conduct and argument.
Right now, you're just demonstrating, acutely, the vicious racism required to support George Zimmerman.
We should take up a collection here, and help you relocate to some place where your kind of thinking would be more welcome. Indeed, let's send you to North Dakota, where an international fugitive is
trying to transform an entire town into a unique homeland for American justice. I'm sure he could use your help, especially since it's the Canadian government that wants him, and they want him because he's an accused "racist".
And, frankly, your ideology would fit in perfectly with the Leith nationalist movement.
Added bonus, living in the United States, it wouldn't be so offensive to hear you criticize what you have no clue about. See, that's another thing you don't seem to get about Americans—we're just like everyone else, and we can criticize our own in ways that others can't. And if you don't like it, remember that you're up against generations of Americans for whom it has long been okay to refer to your mother or sister as a bitch, cunt, slut, or whatever, but God help anyone else who talks about one's mother or sister that way. In other words, we're
human beings. So yes, it makes a big difference, when your ignorance is also advertising your home, if that home is American or foreign. Because not only do Americans get to say things about Mother Liberty that our foreign neighbors do not, we also get to make certain critiques according to empirical data that one
absolutely cannot obtain living in Toronto and having absolutely no clue about American history.
Oh, wait. That's right. You don't want to go to Leith, since your wife and kids wouldn't be welcome. But, hey, you know, it's all a matter of what's important to you. I mean, sure, many in history who we might otherwise find admirable have left their wives and children behind in order to pursue a holy justice they had no comprehension of, but in the twenty-first century—you know, the one we live in?—that sort of outcome is looked upon in lesser light than in the past.
Do what you will, but if you expect a return in respect, it helps to offer up an investment that isn't ignorant to the point of dysfunction.
(Oh, right. You're welcome to show everyone how wrong this post is by actually supporting your delusional rant with some sort of factual assertion, but here's the fun thing about the United States that perhaps you don't appreciate:
Actually requiring you to support your argument could be construed as discriminatory, and therefore illegal, under the ADA. So, yeah. It's up to you whether you wish to save your reputation as being remotely trustworthy; there is nothing I can do to undo the damage you've inflicted upon yourself.)