Exactly. Its like saying this picture
View attachment 6435
is evidence I have a lethal weapon.
Pretty much.
He goes further and claims that he was selling the guns. With no proof except for some vague texts.
Bells why can I only upload a link and not the picture itself? Can u fix it for me?
I can't fix it for you, you will have to PM the mods of this sub-forum or have one of the admin fix it for you.
If you are posting a an image from another website, make sure you click on the 'from url' tab and then
untick the box saying to retrieve the files locally. That's what I usually do anyway.
Actually stalking is the right term. Why is it that Trayvon had a duty to "go straight home"? In a free society we all have the right to aimlessly stroll if we want to, yes even in the rain. Zimmerman was not following neighborhood watch rules:
If you watch
Zimmerman's re-enactment video with the police, you see that Martin had taken the path to go home and had hidden and waited to see what Zimmerman did. In his re-enactment Zimmerman says that it was when Martin went up the path towards his home that he lost him. This was at a T intersection in the footpath. So Martin went right and Zimmerman had lost him. It was at that T junction that the police told him to stop following Martin. Zimmerman then kept walking up, past the right hand path towards the next road, apparently to look up the house numbers and street numbers (in an estate with 3 streets and as the neighbourhood watch, Zimmerman apparently did not know the street names) and to see if Martin had gone up there. He then turned around and walked back towards that T junction in the path and where Martin was and he admitted that he was still looking as he saw nothing there. It was when he got back to the path that led directly to Martin's father's house that Martin then confronted him. This is actually based on Zimmerman's retelling, the day after Martin was shot and killed. He walked the police through what he had done.
So if you imagine a stranger following you and then starts running after you. You find a place to hide and you watch your follower as he walks past where he loses you. And then you see him walk slowly back, still looking for you. Would you get up and walk straight home, leading him to your house? I wouldn't. Martin stood his ground because he felt threatened.
kwhilborn said:
These are all verifiable copies. BELLS KEEPS ON SAYING (OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN) THESE ARE MY CLAIMS.
THESE ARE TRAYVONS TEXT MESSAGES RELEASED BY THE DEFENSE.
And as I had said to you, over and over again, those texts mean diddly squat.
It does not prove anything. They weren't even allowed to be used in Zimmerman's trial. The reason being that they don't actually prove anything about Martin and also because they were not relevant to proving Zimmerman's innocence. The only way they could have been relevant was if Zimmerman's lawyers were going to try to claim that Zimmerman was psychic and had known about those texts when he first spotted Martin walking in the rain, talking on the phone. You were asked, repeatedly, to show why Zimmerman first thought that Martin was about to commit a crime. Your response was to provide those texts. You then claimed that Zimmerman would have known looking at Martin. And you were then asked, repeatedly, what about Martin makes him look like he is about to commit a crime. Your argument points to Zimmerman racially profiling Martin, because there was nothing about his demeanor that would make him look like he had committed any crimes. Because it is not illegal to walk in the rain with a can of soda and a packet of skittles while talking on the phone to his girlfriend and looking at people's houses as he walks.
You have kept misrepresenting everything you have posted and falsely claiming that Martin was a criminal. And you were repeatedly called out for your misrepresentations and your lies.
He was not on trial. He had no criminal record or juvenile record. And yet, you are taking some texts and you have convicted him of being a criminal and then
praised Zimmerman for having killed him, saying it was good that Zimmerman had stopped him - ie, that it was a good thing Zimmerman had stopped him by killing him because you believe he was a criminal. And then you claimed
his killing was justified because you stupidly believe he is a criminal.
Like when
you claimed that Martin had broken into homes or that he had broken into a house and stolen jewelry. The reality is that there was no proof the jewelry had been stolen. You then misrepresented an article, then altered what you quoted from that article to misrepresent that he had stolen them from a nearby home. There was no proof of this. You lied and made it up and misrepresented the article you linked by making it look as if that was what the article was saying, which you added in in brackets in the quoted text, when in reality the article clearly states that there was no evidence the jewelry was even ever stolen.
You have spent so much time trying to prove that Martin is a criminal that you actually lied to try to make it so and claimed that he somehow deserved to die. It's appalling.