The Bible, Gospels and all that are religious interpretations of history. One that argues that the Bible is not history is correct to a certain extent; however, another that argues that the Bible is completely fictional is ignorant of what history really is.
We-e-elll... history... ish... we're not really sure if the Israelites ever WERE in Egypt. It's possible, but there's precious little evidence of that fact, and there's some that they never were. History in the bible is distorted, at best... I'll take my high school text-book, thanks.
I don't believe in the interpretations of God that the Bible depicts, the God that is described through these religious interpretations.
Good; I'd hate for you to believe in a blood-thirsty mass-murderer.
The Bible is great literature and I don't see how anyone could argue that it is not. I don't think the stories are meant to be taken literally, raher they are all parables trying to conveying a higher meaning. Very intelligent authors wrote the Bible.
How is it great literature? The Old Testament is a veritable cess-pool of violence, cruelty, sex (some of it incestuous), and intolerance. This is only broken up by deadly boring geneologies and minutiae of how God is to be worshipped. While I have no problem with sex and violence per se, I DO have a problem when Christians claim the bible is a parable of virtue and family values. The New Testament is certainly an improvement, but it still has some glaring problems; Jesus approves of slavery and racism, for example, not to mention promising that cities who turn out his rabble-rousers will be destroyed.
If these are parables then they are advocating that Christians either kill non-believers (O.T. style) or try and convert them and then wait for God to destroy them if they resist (N.T. style). If not literally, then how SHOULD I read, say Deuteronomy, to get the 'higher meaning'? While I certainly don't deny that the bible contains some good advice (don't kill people, be nice to strangers (which is contradicted several times), dont' steal, etc.), the good is grossly out-weighed by the bad; Hitler succeeded in getting Germany back on it's feet from the worst depression imaginable, but he's not upheld as a paragon of virtue; quite the opposite in fact. One good thing doesn't outweigh a legion of bad.
Oh, and please explain why you believe the bible's authors were intelligent. They should have, at the very least, got a competant continuity editor; whoever hacked that job sure messed it up royally. Want examples? There are many to choose from.