I'm going to say, I don't remember ...
Of course you don't.
I'm going to say, I don't remember ...
Of course *snip*
Thanks, I knew you'd understand.
For instance, I am an atheist, but I feel I could discuss Buddhism and try my best to observe Buddhist lines of reasoning, which are far from 'scientific'.
SAM, what is the difference between theists and atheists after death ?
No, I am saying that if I flip their arguments and present them with the new package, they cannot recognize them.
The shape of the headstone?
Oh, one of those trick questions!
How would what sam thinks be relevant to the question?
I've given some sincere thought to Buddhism in the past. I feel almost ashamed to say so because it comes off as so hippy-college-leftist stereotype. Daoism, as well, was quite appealing. I read the Dao high up in the mountains of Yunnan with snow and winter above me, the colours of fall beside me and hot summer below. Not a soul in sight. I've never felt so at peace.Depending on the flavor, Buddhism doesn't ask anything outside what you can observe and prove for yourself. Its basically...if you don't want to cause yourself suffering, lead a moral life, develop your wisdom and learn to focus your attention.
Why do you care anyway ?
Daoism, as well, was quite appealing. I read the Dao high up in the mountains of Yunnan with snow and winter above me, the colours of fall beside me and hot summer below. Not a soul in sight. I've never felt so at peace.
Then I saw Daoist temples, monks and celebration. I think modern Daoists seem to have completely missed the point of the Dao.
Not really an answer, but ok..I find it interesting to care.
I care because you accused me of something that I didn't do.Why do you care that I care?
I could of course take into consideration other people's feelings, but thats why there is a huge outcry against the UN resolution against hate speech against religions isn't there? Because feelings are irrelevant?
Or is it only some feelings that are irrelevant?
Not really an answer, but ok..
I care because you accused me of something that I didn't do.
The Religion forum should be used only to discuss the scientific nature of religious belief#
This isn't a religious view, it's an opinion on what a forum should be used for.
What exactly did I accuse you of?
Any way... my apologies, whatever it was wasn't intended as an accusation.
Trick question ?
This thread is about extreme religious views, is it not ? I was thinking about the crap Jehova's witnesses always told me, "If you don't believe in God you will burn in hell for eternity." I find that an extreme view, and was just checking what SAM's believe on this matter is.
Asking trick questions.
That's not what they told me, they told me non-believers (in their particular religion) go to hell and burn forever. I have spoken with a number of Jehovah's witnesses and the all said it.Jehovah's Witless told me they don't believe in hell & nonbelievers just die.
Isn't extreme beyond the norm??? It's normal to believe if you don't believe in God you will burn in hell for eternity. Tho it is stupid, unfair, absurd, the cruelest thing I've heard, read or imagined & fearfully fabricated by ignorant arrogant immature humans.
Maybe not, but I didn't ask any trick questions.Nothing wrong with trick questions.