Evolution v Intelligent Design; Should we really teach evolution?

i think a teacher would be wrong if they taught evolution as a fact.

It is actually you that thinks wrong. Evolution is a fact, (and theories). Oh and note that 'theory' does not mean guess or assumption. It is as much a fact as gravity is a fact, (and theories). Of course studying it will help you recognise that fact.

how much info about evolution is needed?

Clearly a lot more than you have acquired, (not being rude, just factual).

Furthermore: Here

i think bio molecular replication would work as the first stage of life.

Out of interest, might I first enquire as to your education on such matters?

SnakeLord, what do you think of this concept:

"[It generally views evolution as a tool used by God...Human beings having developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process.]"

The honest answer or the emotionally pleasing answer?

Honest: Pointless completely evidenceless horseshit.

Emotionally pleasing: Aww, it's cute.

Of course, that's all without mentioning that if this completely evidenceless god guided and indeed initially programmed evolution, he's a moronic twat [search ID: Incompetent Design].
 
It is actually you that thinks wrong. Evolution is a fact, (and theories). Oh and note that 'theory' does not mean guess or assumption. It is as much a fact as gravity is a fact, (and theories). Of course studying it will help you recognise that fact.
Back in the day, they thought Creationism was fact.

The honest answer or the emotionally pleasing answer?
Honest: Pointless completely evidenceless horseshit.
Emotionally pleasing: Aww, it's cute.
Of course, that's all without mentioning that if this completely evidenceless god guided and indeed initially programmed evolution, he's a moronic twat [search ID: Incompetent Design].

As I said, it does not have evidence. It's understandable that, because of this, there is no reason to believe it. However, I'm more curious as to your stance on the concept. Do you find it absolutely impossibly ridiculous?

I mean, it makes sense, and the problem is, if indeed it is the case, we wouldn't have evidence because by God "guiding" the evolution, we could only have evidence that evolution exists.
 

ha ha ha i like it.

yeah i suppose thats true. if god created the universe then who created god. that's a fav topic of mine.

i dont think you understand... this is all iv ever thought. what if after what if. 35 years that i can remember. morning noon and night. awake and sleeping. it is me.

but turtle aside

we are beginning to reach the point when we will be the creationists. dont laugh it not that far away. or would we be intelligent designers?
 
bucky, there are two problems with questioning the origins of "God,

1) It makes equally no sense either way with nature or God

2) God would be outside of the universe and, therefore, not bound by our own universal ways
 
Back in the day, they thought Creationism was fact.

O....k, evolution is a fact, regardless to what one thinks.

As I said, it does not have evidence. It's understandable that, because of this, there is no reason to believe it.

There you go then, the issue is settled right there. When you have some, feel free to bring it up again.

However, I'm more curious as to your stance on the concept. Do you find it absolutely impossibly ridiculous?

Well, there wasn't much of a concept given. That which was given yes, I find ridiculous. No, I don't talk absolutes.

I mean, it makes sense

To who, where, how?
 
O....k, evolution is a fact, regardless to what one thinks.
Yes, for now. For all we know, a new biologist later on will come along with something far better. Who knows?

There you go then, the issue is settled right there. When you have some, feel free to bring it up again.
It's settled only in so far as there is no point believing in God. However, the concept, still needs to be kept, because it still is a real possibility.

Well, there wasn't much of a concept given. That which was given yes, I find ridiculous. No, I don't talk absolutes.
The concept that there is higher life than us, and this higher life guided our evolution. What exactly is so ridiculous about that?

Do you believe that there is other intelligent life in the universe?

To who, where, how?

To any rationalist.
 
Yes, for now. For all we know, a new biologist later on will come along with something far better. Who knows?

Well, things either do evolve or they don't evolve. It is already a fact that they do. Yes, there will be new theories to accompany that fact, but the facts are facts.

It's settled only in so far as there is no point believing in God.

Great, we're done here.

However, the concept, still needs to be kept, because it still is a real possibility.

No more than any other completely pointless unevidenced 'concept'. They are not "real" possibilities, they are pointless imaginations.

The concept that there is higher life than us, and this higher life guided our evolution. What exactly is so ridiculous about that?

What does higher even mean? If you mean higher as in vastly more intelligent then there's plenty ridiculous about it [search ID: Incompetent Design].

Do you believe that there is other intelligent life in the universe?

Emotionally: I would hope so, would be an awful waste of space otherwise. I also love Star Trek Voyager

Honestly: I am open to evidence.

To any rationalist.

Lol.
 
Well, things either do evolve or they don't evolve. It is already a fact that they do. Yes, there will be new theories to accompany that fact, but the facts are facts.
The clerics of Medieval Europe thought it was absolute fact that Creationism was true. Again, they were disproven, and you can be too.

Great, we're done here.
Done? Far from it! We still have to find out how the universe began.

No more than any other completely pointless unevidenced 'concept'. They are not "real" possibilities, they are pointless imaginations.
Much more; certainly a rational man like yourself can see how the concept arises? Again, the only two possibilties for the beginning of the universe is that it began naturally, or was created. That enough makes it relevant, BOTH of them.

What does higher even mean? If you mean higher as in vastly more intelligent then there's plenty ridiculous about it [search ID: Incompetent Design].
Higher, as in, more advanced. What's ridiculous about the idea of higher life?

I did search for Incompetent Design, and that's hardly any logic against ID. We are imperfect beings....Ok? What does that mean? If you were God, would you have created man to be perfect?

Emotionally: I would hope so, would be an awful waste of space otherwise. I also love Star Trek Voyager

Honestly: I am open to evidence.
Exactly, there is nothing ridiculous about the concept of more advanced life.

I think we are on different terms here; you think I'm referring to "God" in a supernatural/magical way. I am not. I am simply referring to "God" in a "higher life" way. God could simply be a higher life form.
 
It is actually you that thinks wrong. Evolution is a fact, (and theories). Oh and note that 'theory' does not mean guess or assumption. It is as much a fact as gravity is a fact, (and theories). Of course studying it will help you recognise that fact.



Clearly a lot more than you have acquired, (not being rude, just factual).

Furthermore: Here

i think that you were sleeping during quantum mechanics? the planck lenght, quantum gravity... universal therory?

but gravity has been proven to exist. like when that brick fell on your head. :p

what do you want me to say. fuck what everybody else thinks. cram it down their throats and if they resist jail them?


but you are missing the point :thumbsup: I AM AN EVOLUTIONIST :thumbsup:
 
bucky, there are two problems with questioning the origins of "God,

1) It makes equally no sense either way with nature or God

2) God would be outside of the universe and, therefore, not bound by our own universal ways

ok?

sorry but really...Hitler has to go
 
How can you say that when he made so many strategic mistakes? He sacrificed Germany for his own vanity.
 
How can you say that when he made so many strategic mistakes? He sacrificed Germany for his own vanity.

He made some mistakes, yes, in the war, but as for Germany, absolutely perfect leader. A powerful will, he isn't afraid to make sacrficies, and he is efficient and got the job done.
 
The clerics of Medieval Europe thought it was absolute fact that Creationism was true. Again, they were disproven, and you can be too.

Clearly there is a difference in the understanding of the word 'fact' between modern day scientists and clerics of medieval Europe. Frankly it doesn't come as a surprise.

Done? Far from it! We still have to find out how the universe began.

There was a giant mashed potato and a giant sausage - both eternal. As chance would have it they accidentally collided and caused the big bang(ers and mash). Look, any idiot can postulate any idiotic idea he feels is warranted. Short of some mildly interesting conversation after a few pints, I fail to see its value.

You have diddly squat to present for your "god did it" hypothesis and so there really is nothing to discuss. Come back to me when you have something.

Much more; certainly a rational man like yourself can see how the concept arises?

Absolutely. It is hardly worth mentioning how ancient people, (that knew nothing about the world let alone the universe), created thousands of invisible gods to explain the things they couldn't understand but that modern day people have invented a grand total of zero, (well, let's give Hubby some merit.. 1).

There was a time when the gods were responsible in matters of weather, (indeed the bible is full of passages concerning that gods control over the weather). For centuries the religious masses, the churches thought that god was the cause of lightning. Franklin and the lightning rod put and end to that. For a while the churches wouldn't dare use these things - weather was in the hands of god. It took a while for them to notice that places with lightning rods didn't get damage while those that didn't have rods kept receiving damage. But it's the will of god the chuches would argue, unable to separate facts from their fiction. In 1767 the church in Venice, having stored two hundred thousand pounds of gunpowder in its vaults, got whacked by lightning and caused one sixth of the entire city to be destroyed and over 3,000 lives to be lost. This was seventeen years after Franklins discovery - all because there are those that would rather cling to hocus pocus than understand, acknowledge and accept facts. It doesn't stop there, countless religious twerps died because of their inability to learn.

But now in the year 2008 you wont find one religious person that claims that the weather is controlled by gods. Long ago did they forget the claims in their book to gods making the weather, controlling the weather, making rainbows as signs of godly promises. Nope, even the theists had to cave in eventually to reality, to facts.

Since then they have shifted their attention to evolution. It is exactly the same as the weather - a fact they must ignore. In this instance it likely wont be as disasterous to them and so they will hang onto it longer. It doesn't make it less stupid. The thing is of course that the moderates are actually collapsing already. Now they come up with your statement: "well, our god exists.. he uhh made evolution". It's idiocy wrapped up in idiocy.

And what do we have left in the year 2008? "Well, gods are 'possible', no we have no evidence but.. well, they're possible". Indeed, and that is the only niche that the religious can hold on to. No, we've long since forgotten about the weather, about plagues, about fortune and misfortune etc etc. The theist world is crumbling into the dust right before his eyes and once when religion and gods have finally gone the way of the dodo - people will still understand how the concept arose.

In fact even the children understand it. They sit there and work out that they have parents and their parents have parents and their grandparents have parents.. A long way down the line they come up with a "higher" parent. That's when they turn around and ask "dad, who made god?"

It is that level of thinking which continues into adulthood in the theist mind.

Higher, as in, more advanced. What's ridiculous about the idea of higher life?

More advanced how? Don't get me wrong but earlier you used the word 'god'. With that word comes a lot of baggage. Do you now just mean some alien civ?

We are imperfect beings....Ok? What does that mean? If you were God, would you have created man to be perfect?

Perfect? I don't use the word - indeed I consider it a meaningless word. Would I give people a blind spot? No. Would I have them grow wisdom teeth? No. Would I cause cows, ducks, cats, people, etc etc to grow all kinds of useless limbs for no good reason? No.

Oh, incase you were wondering:

2cat.jpg

6pig.jpg

turtle.jpg


Frankly that is stupid, plain and simple idiocy - if you are going to use words such as "advanced", "intelligent", "higher". My grandmother is smarter and shes 96 and one gunman short of a posse.

Exactly, there is nothing ridiculous about the concept of more advanced life.

Strange, for most theists there is. The very notion of alien entities kind of upsets them typically. Still, I agree with you - theists are weird.

Look, if we're talking little green men then let me know. Earlier you said "god". There comes a lot of baggage with that word.

I think we are on different terms here; you think I'm referring to "God" in a supernatural/magical way.

Look man, nowadays it seems you new age theists are using god in any bloody way you feel like. Kinda hard to keep up.
 
He was an absolute failure. For instance, he killed many Jewish scientists that could have given him the atomic bomb before the US got it. He could have used the Jews for manual labor instead of killing some millions of them. The manual labor they were forced to do was crap because they weren't given food or proper tools (with some exceptions). He failed to develop any long range bombers. His enigma code was cracked. Most of all, he started another front in Russia which caused his end. Many of the strategic goals of his military were purely symbolic and fufilled no real military objective besides his ego. His economic strategy consisted of forcing other nations into slavery, and being a parasite upon their resources. Even discounting for the moment his cruelty, he was a failure as a leader. The only thing he did well was manipulate the public mind with propaganda and fear.
 
but gravity has been proven to exist. like when that brick fell on your head.

'Proof' is a word best left to mathematics and alcohol. You certainly wont find me using the word because I recognise that absolutes are beyond us. Gravity is however a fact - Walk off the roof of your house, that should be sufficient enough to establish the case. Yes, we can debate the whys and the hows, (theory - no, that does not mean guess or assumption), but gravity, like evolution, is a fact.

but you are missing the point I AM AN EVOLUTIONIST

I don't really care.

Regards,
 
in 200 years there wont be any natural blondes left.

I'd like to see the evidence for that one.

kind of begs the q why biology is nowhere near as predictable as physics, eh?
;)

Because prediction of single particles in isolation is much more difficult that predicting billions of particles?

Though a reclusive billionaire has finished building a supercomputer that analyzes proteins. It will soon begin to unravel the mysteries of life. It's going to be as important to biology as the microscope.
 
Back
Top