piss off. you are just a lazy-eyed sod. i have xplained the limitations of my system here enuf times by now
Actually, I've only seen your explanation once before, (which was yesterday), in another thread - which basically boiled down to you using a very small keyboard and you can't be bothered correcting your errors. While that is fine for you, you can't really expect the rest of us to get anything worthwhile from something we can barely read.
If I was lazy-eyed, as you boldly state, I certainly wouldn't take the extra time trying my utmost to make some sense from what you type.
Maybe it's just me, but it certainly seems that the English in this post of yours far exceeds that of any of your others. It looks apparent that you actually take the time to correct and ensure semi-decent English when you want to tell someone to piss off. I would merely ask that you take the same time when you have a point to make.
The fact is that people can hardly debate or discuss with you if they can't easily understand what you're trying to say.
If it's of any help, it might be worth getting a free Yahoo email account. You don't have to use it for emails, but you can type your posts in there and then use the built in spell checker.
me::'drivel' hey? well that shows me your pre-conecption abouthe whole subject
To be honest with you Duendy, I barely understand a word you type, and thus wouldn't consider myself as having a pre-conception to a subject that I can barely read. That's why I said you come across as you have been taking those drugs you constantly talk about. From what I can gather, you like mushrooms and lsd. I have no issues with that whatsoever..
actually i have as much right to speak about ta element as you
Of course you do, I'm just asking if you can do so in a way that the rest of us can actually read what you're trying to say. Perhaps it's just me, I dunno.. but if you respond to one of my posts with something that I find totally illegible, I have little choice but to either ignore it or respond and state that I cannot read it. I do the latter because I would rather be able to read it than just ignore it.
actually if you opened up a bit and LISTENED and were inspired to do your own research about it you would find that psychedelics are CENTRAL to te very origins and history of myth, philosophy, religion, and science.
I must confess that I have always found it rather amusing when someone comes along, makes a claim and then demands that others do all the research by themselves. I would advise those people that make the claims that it would be corteous and honourable if
they would provide the relevant research material.
I mean surely, having clearly already researched it, it would be far easier and more beneficial for you to provide source material and research material as opposed to expecting everyone here to spend their day scouring google?
Thus far in my travels I have seen very little with regards to psychadelic and mushroom usage being central to the origins of religion, (other than some junkies 'joke' whereby the bible says it's ok to smoke pot because god says: "I give you all the seed bearing plants to use", or some such thing).
Perhaps I have just missed it, and as such would request that source material be provided on the subject - or that the case be discussed and established in a way that I can actually read what is being said.
I am as open as I can get and I am listening as much as my ears allow. Alas I cannot read illegible English, and I hardly feel "inspired" to spend my day trawling through google based upon the claim of one person with illegible English. If you have a source that I can go to, please provide it.
yet because you hve been sucked into the propaganda about them
Propaganda about what? Drugs? Please..
Whether some guy on TV says drugs are bad for you, or whether I've seen what it does to people first hand, or whether I've never seen the effect of drugs in my life has no bearing on your claims concerning mushrooms being central to the origin of religion.
and the experince from use of them
Do you think it is only you that has used drugs? I couldn't personally name you one person that hasn't at some stage dabbled with drugs. Of course it is an absolute given that the more you use them, the more of a potato you become. However, none of this has any relevance to a claim that drug usage was central to the origin of religion.
see? your whole atitude reveals to me your utter complete ignorance all about what you scoff.
What my attitude
should reveal to you is that I cannot read a word you're saying. It is absolutely hideous, and that's being nice. I don't see what other response you would like from me. I could just agree of course to the posts that I can't even read, but that would be dishonest. I could disagree with them, but again - considering I can barely read them - that too would be dishonest. The only remaining option is to tell you your writing is hideous and ask you to try harder next time you have a statement to make.
you imagine that somehow you are superior in your sober abusive ay to people that choose psychedelic experience as a powerful mans to explore temselves and ther relationship with Nature.
Here I disagree. Certainly my language can be abrupt, perhaps a tad harsh and 'unfriendly' - but that is my nature, not only because I'm English, but because I find that most often abruptness is more efficient. Sure, I wont have as many people at my funeral as you will at yours, but by then I wont really give a shit. However, I have no issues or quarrel with people that use drugs - especially considering that we all do to some extent.. be it through cigarettes, cups of coffee, or headache tablets. Of course once you pass the borders with things of this nature, your brain ends up somewhere inbetween that of a squished hedgehog and a rotten potato.
Having said all of that, drug usage is not a way to explore your 'relationship with nature'. It's a fake, a fraud, a wolf in sheeps clothing. What you see and feel isn't real, it's not 'you'.
If you want to try being a different 'you', why not read The Diceman and try that method? It costs less, (a grand total of £4.99) - and if you actually put your heart into it, it can be more than exciting - and is a way of exploring 'your relationship with nature' that doesn't end up doing more harm than good, (usually).
I thought The Diceman was a supreme book and dabbled with the dice for a long time, (for experimentation purposes only).
I ended up doing some amazing, and not so amazing things, that really make you reflect upon life. I proposed to a complete stranger, (she said yes funnily enough and we had a fake wedding in the pub that night - and an interesting evening later on..), I changed the way I was on a daily basis and people actually found it really intriguing. The good thing with this method is that you are always.. "aware".
Anyone can get high.. just go into your kitchen, eat some nutmeg, (tastes like shit), and you'll hallucinate for 15 mins or so. Other than that I'm sure you've heard of the benefits of microwaving banana skins and so on. The problem with these methods, (along with general drug usage), is that you are no longer you. You have no control over the outcome - and most likely forget that which you experienced shortly after.
Of course all of this is entirely irrelevant to a claim that drug usage is central to the origins of religion.
(more on The Diceman:
http://www.lukerhinehart.net/ ) {Interesting to note that the only bad feedback comes from the christians.. Those fuckers are so closed minded to anything that goes against their perverted beliefs and ideals but yet are the first to call people closed minded}.
but you totally underestimate them imagining that someone who takes them suddenly cant spell bla bla.
I have yet to see someone currently taking drugs that actually cares whether he can spell, let alone can or not. What you underestimate is that it is not only you that has or does use drugs. Yes, drugs are sold and used even here on this tiny island. But the fact remains that people under the influence of drugs generally cannot spell, often they can't even speak properly, and their brain has during those moments all the ability of a soggy cabbage.
While that's certainly interesting, I hope you wont take offence if I disagree.
hhhh, i', NOT worrired bout it...silly. i am defending freedom. remember?...therer is a war on drugs. where peole are persecuted on one hand for wanting to spiritually explore, etc, whilst on te other are lied to about 'mental illness'nandpushed toxic drugs--as are many many children. This situation obviously doesn't seem to concern you!