I don't know what Yazata is going to say, but personally I am baffled by your question since it seems like a no-brainer.
It should be possible to analyze even things that seem like "no-brainers."
@Fraggle --
Exactly.
We see the same thing in the paranoid conspiracy theorist. There's something in their lives that they can't control(say they had a bad run in with the law or something) and to cope with the complete lack of control they invent vast, far reaching conspiracies centered around the government(or a shadow government in the case of the NWOers) attempting to impede their lives. In a twisted way it gives them a complete sense of control as it is their actions which are driving this conspiracy, it's the ultimate power trip(well, not quite) as they are not only driving this conspiracy but staying "one step ahead" as well.
A good parallel can be drawn between this and beliefs in the afterlife as both share a number of traits in common. In both cases they give people a sense of control(conspiracy theorists gain "control" over their adversary and afterlife believers gain "control" over what happens after death). In both cases there's absolutely no evidence to support the belief(although conspiracy theories are slightly better evidenced than any afterlife). In both cases the belief tends to be irrefutable in that no amount of evidence or debating to the contrary will convince the believer, the conspiracy theorist will just accuse you of being "in on it" and the believer in the afterlife will just state that they "know it for truth".
Of course, I don't expect the believers in here to accept this analysis.
I'm not a believer and I don't accept that analysis either.
In both cases the belief tends to be irrefutable in that no amount of evidence or debating to the contrary will convince the believer, the conspiracy theorist will just accuse you of being "in on it" and the believer in the afterlife will just state that they "know it for truth".
This refusal to accept an alternative explanation may have little to do with the person's beliefs, and much much more with reactance.
Ie. a person may refuse to accept something as true or give it consideration simply because it is something someone else is telling them, and they perceive this as a limitation of their freedom and autonomy. It may be completely irrelevant what it is all about - it could be about dog poo, their spouse, the government or God.