///our existence is evidence enough
Our existence is not evidence of a god.
You cannot handle not knowing & not understanding so you make absurd claims such as that.
<>
///our existence is evidence enough
You are talking about yourself and your belief that God doesn't exist right?///
You cannot handle not knowing & not understanding so you make absurd claims such as that.
<>
///You are talking about yourself and your belief that God doesn't exist right?
That's fine///
I did not say I believe god does not exist.
<>
So you don't believe that effects are caused by a... cause?///
Our existence is not evidence of a god.
<>
///That's fine
So you don't believe that effects are caused by a... cause?
You mean your admission that God exists? Or are you talking about something else? I seem to have missed it. Kindly point it out to me///
I answered that & you did not respond.
<>
///You mean your admission that God exists?
None of the above? I thought personal insults were frowned upon here///
Are you a child, a fool or a troll?
<>
///None of the above? I thought personal insults were frowned upon here
Ha! Not that garbage again.our existence is evidence enough
I thought you didn't like childish games///
You insult yourself.
<>
You have it backwards. If there's reason to think it exists - i.e. hard evidence.Are you saying only the things you believe exists, is all that exists?
Jan.
Calling it garbage won't make it go away.Ha! Not that garbage again.
I'm not expecting it to go away. I'm just putting it in its appropriate receptacle.Calling it garbage won't make it go away.
A nice example of irrational "thinking"...our existence is evidence enough
Then you are arguing against what IS known about the universe. It is 13.7 billion years old and started as a rapid inflation. Thus the universe has not existed forever and was preceded by a causal condition which is the one distinctive property given to God, the sentient creator.I don’t think there’s anything obvious about the ultimate nature or preconditions of our universe or gods. For all we know our universe could be a god’s left testicle or ovary.
Your are missing the point. Potential is "That which MAY become reality". A latent ability, not yet reality.I don’t see the point in making a distinction between that which may become reality and reality itself. Reality is that which exists, regardless of its conditional form.
You have it backwards. If there's reason to think it exists - i.e. hard evidence.
Failing hard evidence, there's no reason to think they exist. It's certainly possible for something to exist before hard evidence is found but until hard evidence is found, there's no excuse for believing.Are you saying things only exist if you have hard evidence of there existence, and failing that they don't exist?
Lack of support for a naturalistic theory doesn't support a supernatural one.To my knowledge no one has satisfactorily answered what created us. The individual partials that make up our bodies. If you can't answer that don't you dare say there is no God