For you, there is no evidence for God, because you deny, and reject God, and as such cannot accept anything pertaining to God.
What do unicorns have to do with anything?
jan.
If only atheists were satisfied enough to keep it that simple!
Obviously this is not an idea you feel the need to illustrate with your personal behavior.
///
Whatever, but I actually am talking about your inability to perform according to your definition of atheism, so it has nothing to do with views I may or may not advocate.
Your definition? That it is simply a refusal to believe another who says God exists. The fact that you can't control yourself to remain within the parameters of such a simple definition, however, suggests it's more a case of you saying one thing, yet doing another.
///
I am just going by the attached images you post. I assume that if you go to the trouble of extracting them from google search and posting them mid stream in threads like this, you have at least read them and agree with them sufficiently enough to warrant posting them.
///
On the contrary, I and others have no choice but to go by what you post. If you attach images that offer a definition of a subject under discussion, and then rise to defend such definitions when they are viewed critically, people will tend to interpret such behaviour as rising to defend a view that one holds.
///
At the moment, the main fantasy I am having issues with is your insistence on maintaining a discussion totally oblivious to what you said maybe 2 hours ago ...
///
It wouldn’t matter how you characterize the nature of the preeexisting conditions, because sentient or not those are the conditions determined by the whole of reality.
Of course God is a subjective assumption, as are probabilistic determinations, and as beings of limited sensory and intellectual capacity, that’s the best we can ever hope to achieve
Order and chaos are other examples of observational subjectivity. Order is a function of determinability, and chaos is a function of the lack thereof. The more determinability, the less subjectivity. The unattainable comprehensive objective view of reality would only contain order, so if reality is eternal with no beginning or end, then chicken and egg questions regarding organizational precedent in the larger sense lose their significance. Is our universe the product of an elementary school student’s science project? Or some other expression of cosmic fate? We can’t know.
Your biggest problem is you stick to memes, lolcats and copy/paste when faced with a problem that requires critical thinking.
