Asexperia
Registered Senior Member
So what is the conclusion then ?
Where does this go ?
My purpose is to achieve the unification of criteria regarding the nature of time (magnitive).
So what is the conclusion then ?
Where does this go ?
My purpose is to achieve the unification of criteria regarding the nature of time (magnitive).
For me the nature ( the essence ) of time is the movement of objects .
So what is the nature of time ? To you.
↑
For me the nature ( the essence ) of time is the movement of objects .
That is very superficial, you should go deeper.
Does time exist? Ask me in a minute.
Does time exist? Ask me in a minute.
The thing is nobody gets to the essence of time , what is the foundation upon which time is based . Which is of course movement .
I guess it exists then...Every time I ask, it has been some time. It's a different time.
THE TIME TRAIN
The time train (TT) is the metaphor that explains the nature of time.
1- The TT only has one locomotive (it only travels in one direction).
2- Tracks of TT are the dimension of time (past and future).
3- The TT does not have exterior view (there is no reference point).
4- All changes occur inside of the TT.
5- The TT does not make stops (time is continuous).
We all travel on the time train.
What is the Nature of time to any object ? Just to the object itself .
SURVAY
What is your opinion about time?
1. It is objective (real)
2. It is subjective (ilussion)
3. It is subjective (a priori)
4. It is a duality (real)
5. Other