Can't , don't expect to , but will change .
That's the thing . Time is a concept from BB .
Does time exist?
- Thread starter Asexperia
- Start date
- Status
Can't , don't expect to , but will change .
That's the thing . Time is a concept from BB .
the god at least nominated a year,
Like him, just empty rhetoric anyone can make on a public forum.
NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
What do you mean?
Oh, you mean that BB theory for which you couldn't even provide a list of brilliant critics?
And time isn't a concept originating from BB theory. It was already firmly established in Newton's time (pun intended).
Then I would have a discussion with Newton about time . The essence of time .
NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
Go right ahead, but I think you'll find that Sir Newton won't be too responsive to your inquiries.
He would though .
Time is used flippantly , without any real definition .
I try to understand what time actually means , the essence of time . And therefore give time a definition . Rather than just being a word , which is tossed around .
NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
I just provided you with a link which contains a pretty detailed account of how time is used in physics. How is that using time "with any real definition"?
Please read the link I provided: it's a good starting point for such an endeavor.
Please give this link again , I can't find it .
NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
It's in the post you quoted in your post #1263, not even two hours ago: http://sciforums.com/threads/does-time-exist.152720/page-64#post-3488139
Here it is again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics
Need to snozze , I'll get back to yeah .
NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
No problem, take your time.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Antonsen clearly showed how a parabolic pattern can be constructed from straight lines and that the number 4/3 by extension is able to form a mathematical object, a mathematical pattern.
This was a specific response to you post #1264
But I agree, this has no direct connection to a discussion on the existence of time.
Last edited:
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
This was very interesting and informative and I read and listened to the responses and additional embedded clip.Heaven forbid!! A scientific explanation on time and whether it is fundamental or not
I also like Sean Carroll's reply to a similar question.......
http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2015/04/03/the-reality-of-time/
or this
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
What I did not yet see (unless I missed it) is a proposition that time might be a purely subjective human experience, IOW, each person lives in their own time frame experience, an emotional experience.
Why are some people impatient and others display almost infinite patience?
It's obvious that for some time seems go slow (can't wait for 5pm!) and for others time seems goes fast (is it already 5 pm?)
Non-sentient objects only move and act but have no real experience of time at all, such as the clock held by the impatient girl. Has this been addressed before or does anyone care to offer a comment?
NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
Yes, but how does that make a parabola a real, physical object?
Then we both agree that your post #1261 was mostly irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Well the straight lines seemed to produce a real curved 2d plane.
It was not offered gratuitously and was probably triggered by another post. But I agree it was basically unrelated to the OP question and I wont insist to continue this particular subject.
See post 1294, where I already returned to the subject of Time.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Without critiquing your post.
In my proposition of time as a purely individual subjective emotional experience the last sentence could read as; Past events are a memory. Present events are experienced. Future events are anticipated.
NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Don't. It does not work that way.
- Status