(1) I think you're mistaking my ideas with those of religion. I don't believe in God or religious stories. I simply believe that we were created by an intelligent source, based on evidence and common sense. ...(2) There's no need for trickery from God as you suggest. (3)I can not refute your claimed unification of "10s of thousand of observations" with evolution because I don't understand what you even mean by that statement. You really need to be more specific...
On (1) It was you, not me, in post 496 & 500 that suggested the alternative that "god (or whatever) created..." I glad you have dropped god here as that means you are not just spouting dogma, but have a basis for your POV that life was created by an intelligent designer, ID.
On (2) Unfortunately there is a need to postulate "trickery" by this ID if he made 10s of thousands of independent facts all fit into one theory but were not actually consequences of that theory's "force laws".
I gave you the example of 10s of thousands of astronomical observations, all of which follow from the theory of gravity but need not be due to gravity IF some ID has been moving the planets so as to be in accord with the theory of gravity.
Likewise 10s of thousands of biological observations, mainly fossils and DNA sequences changing all agree with the theory of evolution, but it I admitted need not be true if some ID has been carefully creating all these observable facts so as to be in accord with the theory of evolution.
I.e. both gravity and evolution theories could be false if some ID has, for unknown reason decided to trick man into concluding these theories were true.
On (3) I obviously can not "be more specific" / list here 10s of thousands of either gravity or evolution facts, which have been consistent with their theories. I can mention one well known historical example of a theory unifying 10s of thousands of known / observed facts:
Before Maxwell's theory there were at least 5 thousand observations of a magnetic nature and 5 thousand observations of an electric nature. To make the connection with evolution more direct note that a great deal has been learned about DNA changes - how DNA has changed- at least 5 thousand facts. Also there are at least 5 thousand facts known about how fossils have changed - at least that many just relating to trilobites! (More than 20,000 species in at least 10 different orders are known!)
Evolution theory, like Maxwell's theory, unites two superficially unrelated bodies of knowledge. (DNA and fossils). For an ID to make this unification possible with two superficially unrelated bodies of knowledge would require him to intentional set 10s of thousands of independent facts
as if they were governed by the rules of these theories - a huge trick that misleads man into believing in gravity, in evolution and the fundamental connection between electricity and magnetism.
I can not proof this evil ID did not just tricking man into these beliefs.