HR? RAV?You are correct. No person has ever witnessed such an event because it takes millions of years.
you know exactly what i mean SP. play the idiot.Ahem!
to say science knows evolution is a fact is nothing short of a lie.
you know exactly what i mean rav. play the idiot.
show me the lab results of one lifeform chaging into another different lifeform complete with the scientific names.
i await patiently for you to ask "define life".
stalling are we?
you see the problem with the raveningly insane and dangerous religious fanatic types who support creationism, is that people who aren't mad, stupid, ignorant, or consumed with Islamist-style religious fanaticism, can give them examples of macro evolution all day - but because said raveningly insane and dangerous religious fanatic types never pin themselves to a clear definition of what macro-evolution actually means (and by that I mean "what it means on Planet Crazy" not what it REALLY means), it allows them to contuinue to deny (to themselves almost solely) that it takes place.
yes, i would like to see an alternative.
got one .
you know SP, others are going to read this thread you know.
frankly it doesn't matter what i believe.Leopold99, Please answer these simple questions, as directly and in as few words as possible:
1) Do you believe that all sexually produced offspring are slightly different to the parents?
2) If so, do you believe that over time this could result in large differences?
much like producing the lab results wouldn't you say ol' boy?indeed - and for the benefit of the other readers who aren't as familiar with the modus operandi of islamic fundamentalists like you:
Lesson one in how to have tremendous fun making a fundie squirm:
insist they define the key terminology they base their argument upon
they never can - but watching them attempt to change the subject, deflect criticism, and generally just avoid answering can be absolutely hilarious - and this thread has been like a case study in that
Leopold99, Please answer these simple questions, as directly and in as few words as possible:
1) Do you believe that all sexually produced offspring are slightly different to the parents?
2) If so, do you believe that over time this could result in large differences?
frankly it doesn't matter what i believe.
as i pointed out to james these mind experiments are useless as evidence.
much like producing the lab results wouldn't you say ol' boy?
this does not apply to evolution because the first life reproduced asexually.Leopold99, Please answer these simple questions, as directly and in as few words as possible:
1) Do you believe that all sexually produced offspring are slightly different to the parents?
the first answer negates this one2) If so, do you believe that over time this could result in large differences?
go away SP you bore me.yet more squirming
the lab results of what?
you have failed to define the criteria that they need to be based upon
in case you had forgotten - we need your definition of the term macroevolution in order to provide you with the examples you rather disingenuously claim to seek.
go away SP you bore me.
i am not the one supporting evolution.That's why I specified SEXUALLY rather than ASEXUALLY.
And of course that applies to evolution. Evolution does not deal with the beginning of life or asexual reproduction, it deals with sexual reproduction alone.
Regardless of all that..... you have yet again evaded the questions.
Will you please answer them?