Do you think that AI will ever feel emotions?
- Thread starter wegs
- Start date
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Can you be more specific? Are you claiming that AI neural networks are imitating insect intelligence?
If AI is already that advanced, that's very encouraging. Although the intelligence ratio between amoebas and insects is considerable less than the IQ ratio between insect and human intelligence, no? Or is it the other way around?
And of course, size and adaptation is also a consideration. If amoebas needed evolution to survive we would have very smart amoebas by now. But apparently amoeba intelligence is quite sufficient for their survival and there is no need for much improvement on being an amoeba.
OTOH imitating human intelligence is a whole different ball-game. Note that insects are devoid of emotion, AFAIK, all survival techniques in insects are "hard-wired" electro-chemical responses.
But in order to be able to "experience" the world as humans, an AI would have to be able to experience empathic emotions, i.e. placing itself into your shoes emotionally.
p.s. on second thought, insects may well have empathic response systems. They do act "in concert" when threatened by a number of different disasters requiring different responses.
Last edited:
Big Blue . The Chess Match between a Chess Master and the Computer .
Advanced AI has Psychological Programming .
Last edited:
Life is a result of chemistry...chemistry of "stuff" born and synthesised in the belly of stars and accretion disks, as controlled and dictated by gravity.
river said: ↑
Then why is Bio-chemistry different from Periodic Table chemistry ?
Life manipulates the Periodic Table of Elements .
Then why is Bio-chemistry different from Periodic Table chemistry ?
Life manipulates the Periodic Table of Elements .
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
It isn't. What makes you think it is?
So does every other chemical reaction. That is actually the definition of chemistry.
Who said they always do? But the fact remains, chemical reactions have resulted in life.
Life is a result of chemistry...chemistry of "stuff" born and synthesised in the belly of stars and accretion disks, as controlled and dictated by gravity.
Chemical Reactions of Certain Types .
Life Bonds certain Chemicals to manifest Life .
Chemical Reactions don't All Produce Life .
Ummm, isn't that what I just said? Do you have comprehension problems?
Your point pad of your post#231 ?
That's obvious river...bye, I have some science to attend to. read evaluate, post out of interest etc etc, bye
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Well, Carbon, Oxygen, Hydrogen and Nitrogen. What's your point?
From post#225
There is a Difference Between Life Form Intelligence and AI Intelligence .
AI intelligence , is based on the Periodic Table of Elements .
Life is not . Life is from the Suns Electromagnetic Energy . And Volcanic Activity Above and Below the Oceans Surface.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
True.
False.
Life is based on chemistry (specifically carbon chemistry, which is part of the periodic table) - as you literally pointed out three posts ago:
Chemistry is the study of chemical reactions that occur in the physical world. Biochemistry is the study of chemical reactions that occur inside of living organisms.
Chemical biology deals with how chemistry can be applied to solve biological problems while biochemistry is the study of the chemistry of biology. In general, the chemical biology major focuses on small molecules while the biochemistry major focuses on proteins and nucleic acids.
Chemical biology deals with how chemistry can be applied to solve biological problems while biochemistry is the study of the chemistry of biology. In general, the chemical biology major focuses on small molecules while the biochemistry major focuses on proteins and nucleic acids.