Do you love America?

So the U.N was wrong for getting involved?

Close allies of America got involved, other superpowers were against it. In fact, they later admited that the 1999 bombing was a bad judgement because it was later discovered that no mass killings took place in Kosovo. To top it off, NATO purposely bombed civilian targets. 3,000 were found dead in Kosovo, that includes all ethnicities in the region. Most were dead from NATO bombing's, and the very first death was reported a few days after the NATO bombing. No mass killings prior to it. Who's going to pay to rebuild Serbia? Who will pay for its tarnished image, and the image of Serb people? Who's going to pay for Kosovo? Who's going to pay for the countless dead? Who's going to pay for the poisoning of the environment? People, and even children are dying of diseases which weren't common at all prior to the bombing campaign. Who pays for this? Even after confirmation that the 1999 bombing campaign was built on lies America still came back and took Kosovo away from Serbs.. And why? So that they can build a precious pipeline, and Camp Bonsteel.. Why didn't America just work with the Serbian government to achieve this?

After all, these are the same Serbs that fought courageously in WWII, and saved 500+ American fighters that were shot down over former Yugoslavia. These are the ame Serbs that prevented Turkish rule in Europe, an islamic Europe if you will. What do they get in return? They get fucked in the ass by Corporate America which kisses the ass of Saudi's..
 
Were you there? The reason i ask is because i get information the same way everyone else does on this site.
 
Were you there?

I was there during the breakup of former Yugoslavia, and I know exactly how it happened; where it started. I fled for Canada in 97' but I have a lot of relatives in Serbia that have been through the bombing. Besides, I knew from the very start that something didnt feel right about the whole Kosovo Mass Killings bull crap that they were trying to feed the world.. I spoke to my cousin after the bombing, and he basically told me that the Serbian Government at the time sent troops into Kosovo to fight the insurgents KLA.. They had no intention of killing civilians. The powers that be just spun the web the way they wanted it, and used that to gain support for the bombing campaign.. Why? Should be pretty clear by now that they'll build a pipeline through Kosovo, and lets not mention that Camp Bondsteel aka Guantanamo Bay 2 was being built all this time.. Soon after its completion Kosovo was taken from Serbs, which means that it was planned out from the very start..
 
Last edited:
Dont get me wrong. I have read accounts of crimes committed against the Serb's by the people they ended up fighting. Guees things just came to a head.
 
Well then, i guess it is more personal for you.

Why? Should be pretty clear by now that they'll build a pipeline through Kosovo

Building a pipeline decades later dies not mean anything. Pipeline is the new buzzword i guess. If pipelines are built in Japan or Germany what does that mean?
 
john said:
Building a pipeline decades later dies not mean anything. Pipeline is the new buzzword i guess.
The atrocity of the Kosovo bombings was connected to pipeline routes and similar economic considerations immediately, by the foreign and leftist media.

Pipeline is not a new buzzword. The military analysts have been referring to the Afghan and surrounding regions, up into the Caspian basin, as "pipelinistan", for many years now.
 
If you want the army subject to civilian control, you get some bad with the good.

The alternative is generally thought to be worse, by those fond of freedom and democracy anyway.

So basically the army is made up of independent thinkers who obey orders? Heh. And when under military rule they don't obey orders? An independently thinking soldier is not a good soldier. Its no coincidence that dog training evolved in the military.
 
Back
Top