well its nice to see you have finally shown your true colors as a right wing neocon hack.
What a brilliant response!!! It would take another marxist to know exactly what the hell you are saying.
well its nice to see you have finally shown your true colors as a right wing neocon hack.
Keeping things simple makes things clear as long as all info is explained. such as explain EVERYTHING that effects somethings position something you don't do.
* a belief that capitalism is based on the exploitation[5] of workers by the owners of the means of production not me
* a belief that people's consciousness of the conditions of their lives reflects the dominant ideology which is in turn shaped by material conditions and relations of production. not me
* an understanding of class in terms of differing relations of production, and as a particular position within such relations. not me
* an understanding of material conditions and social relations as historically malleable. me
* a view of history according to which class struggle, the evolving conflict between classes with opposing interests, structures each historical period and drives historical change. not me
* a belief that this dialectical historical process will ultimately result in a replacement of the current class structure of society with a system that manages society for the good of all, resulting in the dissolution of the class structure and its support (more often than not including the nation state). not me
burden of proof is on the accuser.
Like throwing nuclear bombs on civilians?
Killing women and children? Torturing innocent people? Running death squads? Occupying foreign countries? Heh.
Insanity: doing the same thing for 60 years and expecting different results. :crazy:
Insanity: doing the same thing for 60 years and expecting different results. :crazy:
Insanity, doing the same thing for 41,270 post and never doing anything about it.
Still at Home, daddy's house in India.
America is as much of a joke as its so called peaceful mission in Kosovo/Kosova..
Nice little Guantanmo Bay they built up there, what's its name again, Camp Bondsteel?
Hahah, spreading democarcy my ass. America is all about self-interest, and hypocrisy.
Lets taint the Serbs image beyond recovery, and then top it off by taking their land and putting up a new Guantanamo Bay there.
In fact, America never goes to war unless its out of interest. They just fabricate reasons, and push for support right before they bomb the shit out of everything.
"In Money We Trust" - Tis the American way.
Gooo Canada!!! Screw America!
Just because Buffalo and Spock and the lads are defending the indefensible, and deluded in ways that are clear to you, does not mean you understand things outside your experience related to them. You are wrong about the "good soldier", and you underestimate the sophistication of US military command.SAM said:A good soldier is one who only follows orders, basically cannon fodder. It doesn't matter how far up you go in the military, they can only think in terms of killing people as victory.
Somebody's got to balance the Israeli agitprop.spock said:i will never understand why this paid anti american propagandist is allowed to write here.
No country, does anything, unless they perceive it to be in their best interest.
Just because Buffalo and Spock and the lads are defending the indefensible, and deluded in ways that are clear to you, does not mean you understand things outside your experience related to them. You are wrong about the "good soldier", and you underestimate the sophistication of US military command.
America is setting countries back, poisoning nations with bombing's (ie. Serbia), partitioning a nation against its will (ie. Serbia - Kosovo), and murdering innocent people with bombing's (ie. 1999 bombing of Serbia).
No. I mean you don't know what's involved in soldiering, and your description of robotic order-taking cannon fodder is silly, as is your apparent belief that US military command is very simpleminded.SAM said:You mean all US troops are bad soldiers? Because they haven't learned to say no to the last 50 years of militaristic hubris?
No. I mean you don't know what's involved in soldiering, and your description of robotic order-taking cannon fodder is silly, as is your apparent belief that US military command is very simpleminded.
Civilians who underestimate the nature of military operations, the complexities involved, tend to do lot of harm when an army is put at their disposal. It wasn't US military command that got the US into Iraq in this ugly fashion, for example.
If you want the army subject to civilian control, you get some bad with the good.SAM said:And the army couldn't refuse. Because they don't follow orders? Because they are independent thinkers?