Do we need a Mod for the encyclopedia ??

[S.A.M.]

Give us this day our daily dose.

Amen.

 

[Nickelodeon]

 

[The Devil Inside]

get on your hamachi, fucktard.

 

[S.A.M.]

All this drama reminds me of P.G . Wodehouse:

"Each, in fact, was to the other, a perpetual freak show, with no charge for admission".

:shrug:

 

[James R]

In answer to the title of the thread, clearly we do need moderation for sciwiki.

Some people posting to it obviously can't control their childish immaturity without somebody else doing it for them. This has flow-on effects of the kind we've seen in this thread and elsewhere, with members bickering with each other rather than contributing anything useful to either the forum or the encyclopedia.

The sooner we institute some moderation on the encyclopedia the better.

 

[lixluke]

It is important to have pages about members in the wiki about a site that is made up of members. Some claim that members are bias towards their own articles, and should not be allowed to edit them. Others claim that nobody has the right to say members are bias towards their own articles. It is pure psycho fascism to claim that members do not have the right to edit their own articles.

Furthermore, members should have the right to have final say iregarding anything on the wiki that pertains to them. Mainly becase any content about a member affects the member more than anybody. Therefore, that member should have 100% courtesy in making decisions about anything pertaining to him within the wiki.

Furthermore, there is no such thing as positive flamewar. Come claim the encclopedia should be serious, while others want it to be an uncyclopedia of nonsense.

 

[spuriousmonkey]

I suggest Lixluke is perma-banned from the wiki. Because it feels right.

 

[leopold]

I suggest Lixluke is perma-banned from the wiki. Because it feels right.

i second the motion.

Furthermore, members should have the right to have final say iregarding anything on the wiki that pertains to them.

what an absoluely brilliant idea!
i wonder why lixluke is the one to mention it?

 

[Nickelodeon]

i second the motion.

Aye.

 

[lixluke]

That is because you are members of a well known group of vandals. You even put it in your communist avatar. Last time you had goats in your avatar. Perhaps you should be banned.

 

[leopold]

That is because you are members of a well known group of vandals. You even put it in your communist avatar. Last time you had goats in your avatar. Perhaps you should be banned.

so says the man that deletes the truth from sciwki cause it bruises his fragile ego.