Thank you for making my point more succinctly.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Do we need a Mod for the encyclopedia ??
- Thread starter Sputnik
- Start date
Thank you for making my point more succinctly.
You clearly havent read the wiki.
No, you clearly don't know how to use it.
Another sign that you dont know what you're talking about.No, you clearly don't know how to use it.
Here, try actually reading it.
http://www.sciforums.com/encyclopedia/
Another sign that you dont know what you're talking about.
Here, try actually reading it.
http://www.sciforums.com/encyclopedia/
Funny, nowhere does it say to act like an immature idiot. But, perhaps you've muddled this statement to be a license to act like an immature idiot:
"and its up to you to choose what is appropriate"
... and of course, this statement completely alludes you:
"Nip vandalism in the bud or be positive and add something!"
Funny, nowhere does it say to act like an immature idiot. But, perhaps you've muddled this statement to be a license to act like an immature idiot:
"and its up to you to choose what is appropriate"
... and of course, this statement completely alludes you:
"Nip vandalism in the bud or be positive and add something!"
You do realise the front page is based on contributions from several members dont you?
You do realise the front page is based on contributions from several members dont you?
So what?
And you still haven't given a single good reason why we need pages on members?
I gave you a reason. If you dont agree with it thats your problem, not mine.So what?
And you still haven't given a single good reason why we need pages on members?
Besides, the members pages are but a fraction of what we've added on there.
"Nip vandalism in the bud or be positive and add something!"
That was written by Pete and spuriousmonkey. Pete did the first part. I did the last part.
I gave you a reason. If you dont agree with it thats your problem, not mine.
I don't agree with it, since it prescribes no rationale. That fact that you don't understand the concept of an encyclopedia's purpose in no way should reflect anyone else's.
That was written by Pete and spuriousmonkey. Pete did the first part. I did the last part.
Then, you are a hypocrite.
And yet you still don't understand what a wiki is. Again and again - your problem.I don't agree with it, since it prescribes no rationale. That fact that you don't understand the concept of an encyclopedia's purpose in no way should reflect anyone else's.
And yet you still don't understand what a wiki is. Again and again - your problem.
I think we both understand what a 'wiki' is by definition. But, I don't think you understand the difference between childish and adult behavior.
An adult, for example, wouldn't see the purpose in having pages on members there where it would be reasonable to assume adolescents, like yourself, would have access to it and abuse it. And that is exactly what is happening.
Back to you.
No, I can understand the difference. I can see you are a cry baby.
poor guy isnt getting his way.
maybe he should get a lolly.
maybe he should get a lolly.
No, I can understand the difference. I can see you are a cry baby.
You do appear to understand the difference and are acting accordingly, as expected.
You do appear to understand the difference and are acting accordingly, as expected.
I quite understand that a moderator like you who calls another moderator a dickhead in the moderator forum is childish.
I quite understand that a moderator like you who calls another moderator a dickhead in the moderator forum is childish.
I can stand up to you and tell you what I think about you to your virtual face, so to speak. I won't sneak around posting it under your wiki page nor will I air it out in public, as you just did.
Again, your adolescent behavior behooves you.
I never wrote anything on your wikipage. I turned a word into a link.
Of course you wouldn't do anything sneaky as calling me dickhead, fuck you, fuckwit and the likes on a forum hidden for most. Oh wait you did.
I waited a few days..and no apology.
Of course you wouldn't do anything sneaky as calling me dickhead, fuck you, fuckwit and the likes on a forum hidden for most. Oh wait you did.
I waited a few days..and no apology.
Now, can we move past your penchant for adolescent behavior and get to what sciwiki was intended?
Well, since you seem to be the expert on what the wiki was created for, why don't you share that knowledge?
Nah. Don't bother. You're talking out of your ass.
You might be interested to know that the wiki was created so as to write about sciforums culture. It wasn't intended to be some kind of new wikipedia. It was to be for sciforums, about sciforums.
And, you might be surprised to learn that sciforums is its users.
Hence, pages on individual users are a necessity if we wish to stay true to the original motivation for the creation of the sciwiki.
What I find funny is that you'd be arguing a completely different stance if you'd thought to create an article insulting some woo woo or woo woo's in general before a page was made about you and you threw a big stink about it.
Do you ever look in the mirror?
I can stand up to you and tell you what I think about you to your virtual face, so to speak. I won't sneak around posting it under your wiki page nor will I air it out in public, as you just did.
Again, your adolescent behavior behooves you.
kind of like following ToR around and trolling her threads?
you are such a winner, dude.