consequent
i'll try and explain the first two. i will denounce the "xenobiology copes" as the work of the devil.
"there is an infinite succession of cause and effect"
[therefore] a (creator?) god cannot be postulated
The Cosmological Argument (Clarke’s version.)
1- At all times, something must have existed.
2- Either there has always existed an independent being or else there has been an infinite succession of dependent beings
3- There cannot have been an infinite succession of dependent beings
4- Therefore there has always existed an independent being
i am focusing and disputing #3
"there is no entity logically imaginable that can abrogate natural law"
i was hoping that meant that there can be no concept of god (in the conventional sense) since #3 is being disputed
i'll try and explain the first two. i will denounce the "xenobiology copes" as the work of the devil.
"there is an infinite succession of cause and effect"
[therefore] a (creator?) god cannot be postulated
The Cosmological Argument (Clarke’s version.)
1- At all times, something must have existed.
2- Either there has always existed an independent being or else there has been an infinite succession of dependent beings
3- There cannot have been an infinite succession of dependent beings
4- Therefore there has always existed an independent being
i am focusing and disputing #3
"there is no entity logically imaginable that can abrogate natural law"
i was hoping that meant that there can be no concept of god (in the conventional sense) since #3 is being disputed