Dear Believers, prove your god or gods is/aren't just fiction(s).

DaveC426913 said:
Hm. so it's an illusion. I can't actually torture real people; I only have a simulation of doing so.
Click to expand...
No worries… you can pre-adjust you’r simulation to be indistinguishable from the reality you desire… ie… durin the simulation you woudnt have any idea that you wasnt actualy Lucifer so you woudnt miss out on any of the shts-an-giggles from the misery of the people in a lake of fire.!!!
DaveC426913 said:
That sort of sucks the oompf out of eternal afterlife, if it's just an illusion.

Which has some wider implications - as you go on to mention:
Click to expand...
Still no worries… many people will choose to reject my plan in favor of the alternative - what ever that may be… an ther woud be no penalty for this rejection… eg… no threats of Hell Fire… ect.!!!
DaveC426913 said:
Sure, but they're a simalcrum of my loved ones. It's an illusion, a simulation, a hallucination.

I'm not actually reunited with my dead wife, or first teenage girlfriend; I am just reunited with a simulation of them.

I wonder how soon most people would get tired of interacting with copied of real people.
Click to expand...
Yeah… it prolly wouldn't be for you ether… but for me… i woud realy be lookin forward to playin wit my dog that died several years ago :)
 
DaveC426913 said:
How? A bacterium doesn't have the capacity to decide to be human. You'd be stuck.

You'd have to set up an expiration timer - a dead man switch. "I would like to be a bacterium for one day and then automatically revert back to my human form."

Could I be Lucifer? Could I torture all other humans in a molten lake of fire? Or only the humans whose idea of heaven is to be tortured in a molten lake of fire?
Click to expand...
God could be Lucifer. The War in Heaven decided all that. So, the winner was God and the loser was Lucifer.

And always had been.

Prove I'm wrong.
 
Looks like Trek has ran away again.

So just to remind you Trek if you do come back:


There are posters on here who understand science and have made efforts to read about the import milestones.
There are posters who remember the stupid nonsense you have posted in the ID thread, the lies, trolling, pretending not to understand, failing to answer questions.
You repeated some of that in this thread which was called out so you ran away.

Your call.
 
James R said:
Either way, it's off topic for this thread.
Click to expand...
Then you should deduct points from the poster that brought up the subject of magic.
Otherwise you come across as biased and intolerant of people who believe differently to yourself
James R said:
I didn't ban you. I issued you with an official warning. You were banned because you have accumulated a number of previous warnings and you had enough active warning points to trigger an automatic temporary ban. I also let you off with a friendly warning on another matter, because I'm a nice guy and issuing you with more points would have extended your ban time unreasonably, in my judgment.
Click to expand...
I’m not if the same opinion.
I don’t think you had any cause to penalise me other than you personally don’t like wglhat I’m saying, and how I’m saying it. I think you are heavily passive-aggressive
James R said:
I suggest that it might be more productive for you to come to terms with your ban, which is now in the past, and try to discuss the thread topic. I posted an interesting reply to the vaguely on-topic stuff you wrote.
Click to expand...
I already know what to expect from the type of atheists that frequent in religious threads. Maybe y’all should tone down in the sensitivity. You may even learn something
James R said:
Since you have decided to make this an issue, I publish the warning I gave you here. Readers can judge for themselves whether I warned you for illegitimate reasons. Here's the text of the explanatory message you were sent:
Click to expand...
Don’t worry about it.
I know “hurting atheist feelings” is an offence in their coo-coo for coco-puff world.
 
Pinball1970 said:
Nope, you kept repeating the same creationist nonsense and were rightly reported.
Click to expand...
While “creationsists” may state the glaring obvious. I assure you I copied of no one.
Pinball1970 said:
Cell from goo or some other idiotic garbage)
You also had the audacity to claim that "the exquisite design of the cell," was evidence of a god.
Seriously? Is your memory that short or are you just a liar?
Click to expand...
lol!! Goo, primordial ocean, what’s the
difference?

Were you there?
Tell me what you actually know regarding the myth of the first cell :D

The idea of the cell being a product of a creator is way more plausible than the notion of goo or ocean (you decide) randomly putting all the bits I mentioned together. Sorry buddy. It’s just the way the cookie crumbles
Pinball1970 said:
I asked you five? Six times to tell me which image was a cell (designed according to you) and salt crystals on another thread.
Click to expand...
So what if you did?
What does it change?
I asked you to show where ID was taught in schools as a way to teach religion. We looked over that document you kept bringing up and there was nothing that said they wanted to teach religion, or use ID as a Trojan horse to teach religion.
Pinball1970 said:
Not only did you fail to get the correct answer you did not even ATTEMPT to answer.
You promptly ran away when pressed.
Click to expand...
I aske what the point was and how it impacted on what I was saying a few times and got nothing. So stop with your obfuscation.
Pinball1970 said:
Do you expect anyone on here to take you seriously after that?
Click to expand...
I dont really expect anything serious at all. Especially with threads like these. But I do hold out some hope that one of you will decide to have a proper discussion without cry-babying to the moderator
 
Trek said:
While “creationsists” may state the glaring obvious
Click to expand...
That's why creationist "science" is garbage, "its obvious" is as infantile an argument as you can get and also based on a lie. Evolution disproves the creation myth, that is is why you rage against it even though you have absolutely zero training in life sciences. You have zero interest in the science, just a desperate attempt to preserve your myth.
 
Trek said:
lol!! Goo, primordial ocean, what’s the
difference?
Click to expand...
Because the literature and text books does not talk about Abiogenesis like a six year old. STOP misrepresenting science this way.


Trek said:
So what if you did?
What does it change?
Click to expand...

Because that was your claim can't you follow an argument? For even one or two posts?

If course you can, you just pretend you can't like a liar and troll. Reported for lying, Again and trolling AGAIN.
 
Pinball1970 said:
Evolution disproves the creation myth, that is is why you rage against it even though you have absolutely zero training in life sciences.
Click to expand...
Ah good!
A claim you should be able to back up
Explain how “Darwinism” disproves “creationism”?
 
Pinball1970 said:
Because the literature and text books does not talk about Abiogenesis like a six year old. STOP misrepresenting science this way.
Click to expand...
The point of communication is to relay an understanding to others. You understood exactly what I meant. So what’s your beef?
You and others misrepresents God and scripture all the time (this thread is a an example), so grow up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top