Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
Lordy, lordy, lordy.Said like a totally blind from both person who think everybody is like him. He thinks this way purely in the basis that he can’t see therefore nobody else can see.
Lordy, lordy, lordy.Said like a totally blind from both person who think everybody is like him. He thinks this way purely in the basis that he can’t see therefore nobody else can see.
I hate the eight ferals a local momcat left for me to take care of. They start TNR in December.Of course because that makes perfect sense.
I also hate kittens, because that is what atheists do right?
Damn catsI hate the eight ferals a local momcat left for me to take care of. They start TNR in December.
Uncanny. I was thinking the exact same thing about you.Said like a totally blind from both person who think everybody is like him. He thinks this way purely in the basis that he can’t see therefore nobody else can see.
I know it's a side note, TNR?I hate the eight ferals a local momcat left for me to take care of. They start TNR in December.
Did you mean "theologian" or "theist"? There are atheist theologians, as being a believer is not a prerequisite for studying religion.I'm perfectly happy living alongside believers. (Some of my closest and most respected loved ones are Theologians.)
TrapI know it's a side note, TNR?
It sounds like you, Trek, have an idea of what constitutes evidence for God. Maybe that comes with being a "real theist" (?)You’re talking nonsense.
You have no idea of what would constitute evidence for God. That comes with being a real atheist.
No. This is a common mistake. While some atheists say there is no God, I think they are a small minority of all atheists. Most atheists - including most of the atheists on sciforums - say only that, so far, they have seen no evidence sufficient to convince them that there is a God.The fact you are atheist means that for you there is no God.
That doesn't follow at all, Trek.So no amount of evidence will convince you.
Only if the speaker is aware that there is evidence.But to use “there is no evidence” is just dishonest...
For somebody who keeps accusing others of lying, you're not being entirely honest yourself, Trek. Either that or you don't really understand atheism very well. Now that I have explained it a bit more, is it making more sense to you?Q Why don’t you believe in God
A There’s no evidence
Q How do you know there is no evidence
A Errrmmm!!!
Not know there is no God. Suspect, maybe. But we atheists have open minds (most of us). You can convince us with your evidence. Can't you?You are an unbeliever..
What do you know?
All you know is that there is no God.
Is it possible for an atheist to become a theist, Trek?Because you’re an atheist
That’s all you can ever know
You're not making much sense with that, I'm afraid, Trek. "You don't know what evidence is required when asked" does not, in any way, imply "You can't want evidence". Can you see that?I call you a liar because you lied about wanting evidence. You can’t want evidence because you don’t know what evidence is required when asked.
I'm not so sure. Over a period of several years on this forum, I had discussions with another guy called Jan Ardena, a self-described "theist" who used to visit this forum regularly for quite a while. Like you, he was very insistent about being able to read the minds of atheists, but he invariably got things wrong even after repeated and careful correction. In the end, he sort of self-destructed and rage-quit the forum. I think that, in the end, he started questioning his own faith. Rather than trying to seek out the truth, he ran away from the challenges the atheists had put in his head. I think he probably went back to banging his drums and chanting near train stations, trying to encourage other people to join the Hari Krishnas. Which is all fine, if a little lacking in intellectual courage.If I am wrong correct me
It’s that simple