So, Afghanis are too stupid to realize that bombing the enemy sometimes kills the innocent? How many Afghani women and children were accidently killed in the course of fighting the Russians?
So, Afghanis are too stupid to realize that bombing the enemy sometimes kills the innocent? How many Afghani women and children were accidently killed in the course of fighting the Russians?
The Afghanis didn't keep count, nether did the Russian, it wasn't important to either of them.
Like Americans are too stupid to realise that their foreign policy creates terrorism?
Or the Danish are too dumb to realise that occupying a country creates resentment against the people who are doing the occupation even without targeting their religious beliefs?
Really? That kind of callousness has become endemic only to Americans.
Soviet Lists Afghan War Toll: 13,310 Dead, 35,478 Wounded
aaaaand so? Does that change the wrongness of it? Two wrongs don't make a right. Killing the enemies children just because they killed yours is still wrong.As the death of Afghani and Iraqi children has hardened the minds of Afghani and Iraqi resistance fighters.
How so abetting? With weapons or simply be being there?The occupier is that person in Afghanistan and Iraq who is abetting the occupation. Civilians in the homeland are another matter altogether. Read my post more thoroughly.
How come no muslims attacked russian interests worlwide, when russia invaded afganistan, there was no call for a worldwide jihaad.
.
I think this thread has lost track of the topic: Is anyone here going to justify blowing up and embassy because that country allowed some cartoons to offend them? If not then I think this thread is over.
aaaaand so? Does that change the wrongness of it? Two wrongs don't make a right. Killing the enemies children just because they killed yours is still wrong.
How so abetting? With weapons or simply be being there?
If the Chinese were occupying the US and bombing Americans every day for seven years, what would be the American response?
Well I would expect Americans to attack Chinese soldiers, not civilians
So, if innocent people are killing in an embassy bombing over offensive cartoons, you would understand it if we dropped some daisy cutters on Kabul?
Almost as certain that it won't change if it wrong or right. Why can't you answer the question?After seven years of being bombarded by the Chinese? Are you certain of that?
After seven years of being bombarded by the Chinese? Are you certain of that?
Or if the US is running a terrorist training school and funding death squads and dictators that murder civilians, its understandable if someone would retaliate?
The Americans count their own dead and wounded - and release the numbers month by month, not years later.SAM said:The Afghanis didn't keep count, nether did the Russian, it wasn't important to either of them.
”
Really? That kind of callousness has become endemic only to Americans.
Soviet Lists Afghan War Toll: 13,310 Dead, 35,478 Wounded
I think this thread has lost track of the topic: Is anyone here going to justify blowing up and embassy because that country allowed some cartoons to offend them? If not then I think this thread is over.
aaaaand so? Does that change the wrongness of it? Two wrongs don't make a right. Killing the enemies children just because they killed yours is still wrong.
How so abetting? With weapons or simply be being there?
Speaking of oblivious: The context "freedom of expression" seems completely invisible to you, and very difficult for Muslims in general to comprehend, if the posts on this forum are any evidence.diamond said:You have Danish troops in Afghanistan, their media and some parties of their government allowed offensive religious cartoon which is comparable cultural propaganda, and European sanctions in Palestine and other Muslim nations. Why are you people so oblivious?
Context is the answer.
Speaking of oblivious: The context "freedom of expression" seems completely invisible to you, and very difficult for Muslims in general to comprehend, if the posts on this forum are any evidence.
People who blow up embassies in reaction to cartoons do not represent Islam even if they say they do, but people who publish cartoons in Denmark exemplify cultural oppression in solidarity with soldiers in Pakistan even if they, and the soldiers, say they don't.
Do you think people don't know that there are Danish troops in Afghanistan? You have Danish troops in Afghanistan, their media and some parties of their government allowed offensive religious cartoon which is comparable cultural propaganda, and European sanctions in Palestine and other Muslim nations. Why are you people so oblivious?
Context is the answer.
By speaking in favor of it (esp. being in Afghanistan or Iraq at the time of doing this), by denouncing the resistance, by funding occupation forces, by giving weapons to the puppet government, by providing security for corrupt leaders, by engaging actively in the destruction of Afghani/Iraqi civilians, by engaging in cultural propaganda to justify occupation.
Journalists should not be targeted unless they work for the US government or are propaganda tools for the US government. Civilian NGOs should not be targeted if delivering medical care for civilians.
It's rather simple really.