only if you're projecting...
1- there are whole segments who do this
2- the 2A (I know it's a "law" and that you like to interpret them with your bias, but you will not find anything in said amendment that designates that weapons of any kind can't be owned and stored at home. interpret away...)
unfortunately for you, I actually know Dr_Toad.
unfortunately for you, I am not ignoring the segment who uses target practice for effective force, etc
unfortunately for you, I also remember the context and reason sport target shooters were brought up in the first place: this means that shooters (no clarification on your part, so this applies to all shooters per your statement) target practice to kill.
this, specifically, ignores large segments of the population that only want to learn to sport target shoot, which only means killing
concentric circles in a specific way to increase the assigned points in order to establish superiority over another competitor for recognition of hard work, training and skill.
the digression into this topic is because you irrationally judge others based upon your own fearful bias (called prejudice) and you wish to assign an emotional label to justify your argument and place a perceived negative attachment to anyone who would diverge from your opinion and beliefs
Non. C'est comme si le fait de discuter avec une personne émotive et irrationnelle ne ferait qu'exacerber la situation.
It's bad enough considering the whole Koresh argument you presented... at least I got a laugh out of that since you (again) completely ignore fact for your opinion and beliefs
so - what kind of fanatic would have chosen Waco as demonstrative of cults being selected for punishment while ignoring the fact that BATFE was investigating the stockpiling of
illegal weapons??
... not weapons in general, but
illegal weapons.
Illegal specifically means :
and again, because the law is relevant in this case :
when any organization, religious group, cult, business, individual or family stockpiles
illegal weapons, law enforcement has the right, should they present a warrant or have probable cause during a routine visit and/or health and welfare check, to search and detain individuals as well as seize illegal weapons. In point of fact, even if said weapons are not illegal, LEO's have the ability to seize said weapons to check them should there be probable cause presented during an investigation.
so, only someone who is either completely ignorant of the situation or has an agenda that is intentionally ignoring facts would use the BD's as an example in that case
There is plenty of evidence you're becoming far too emotional and irrational to continue conversing with, as noted by your inclusion of me into a derogatory attempt to troll while talking to Sculptor
is that your version of trolling because I asked you to use source material from the only reporting agencies we have instead of randomly choosing an opinion article that articulates your moral argument while cherry-picking?
All I wanted to do was
save time from extensive research - it's never stopped you from completely denying facts in the past, so why would you suddenly be offended, let alone actually abide by the request?
repeating this doesn't make it truer
emotional and irrational statement made from fear and bias
it's because of people like you that our country established the 2A
fascinating that you would choose to state this - supports the argument that you have an emotional bias and percieved moral superiority to others. I'm almost surprised you didn't continue that with some religious or corporal punishment to go along with the self-righteous posturing.
what next?
are you going to tell everyone that I'm a heathen? That I don't care? That I want children to die?
which fanatical leftist rhetorical argument will you choose?
yes, I am sure. no, they're not homeschooled.
Yes, I did ask them. Yes, the school did talk to the children and parents (mostly at the request of people like me).
Just because you can present a poll to support your beliefs doesn't mean you know jack sh*t about the local school or my grandkids...
That whole attack was to present the farcical argument that I am not aware of my grandkids just because you really, really want to believe that you know more about my local area than I do and you want to present the talking points of your ideology as fact because my reply directly contradicted your statement. Again: the digression into this topic is because you irrationally judge others based upon your own fearful bias (called prejudice) and you wish to assign an emotional label to justify your argument and place a percieved negative attachment to anyone who would diverge from your opinion and beliefs.
La vérité blesse?
interruption: I am going to have to address your other issues later.
Duty calls
