Climate-gate

Not this one. This one has been happening only recently, because its cause - artificial CO2 boosting - is recent.
So?

This climate change has been happening for a couple of hundred years, only, and is a serious problem for us.

Yet another AGW model prediction coming true.
CO2 has been rising for the last 18 years, and there has been no global warming during this period, please try to keep up. Haven't you heard of the climate hiatus? http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...atellite-data-no-global-warming-past-18-years
 
Climate change has been happening for the entire history of the Earth, as even before the Earth had a climate, changes were happening to form the climate that we now have.

True, try to dispute this with rational facts.
agian,it appears you have trouble deciphering the difference.
 
And it appears, that you have trouble, not being repetitive. That suit might be overheating your cerebral cortex.
if your pathetic, primitive data argument or thought's alone wasn't repetitive, then maybe i would not.as i told you in the other topic. step up your level of acknowledgement of this subject.
 
if your pathetic, primitive data argument or thought's alone wasn't repetitive, then maybe i would not.as i told you in the other topic. step up your level of acknowledgement of this subject.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=82160

Ice has increased for every year that measurements have been taken, it is now at record MOST levels. You may not like the truth, but if you want to argue this, your argument is not with me, but with NASA, so good luck.




article-0-1574BF6B000005DC-709_634x632.jpg
 
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=82160

Ice has increased for every year that measurements have been taken, it is now at record MOST levels. You may not like the truth, but if you want to argue this, your argument is not with me, but with NASA, so good luck.




article-0-1574BF6B000005DC-709_634x632.jpg
ok. and ? what is this suppose to prove ? again, as i told you in the other topic. step up your level of acknowledgement of this whole subject.

edit-
i guess you did not understand this part of your own link,
" Geography and winds are thought to be especially important. Unlike the Arctic, where sea ice is confined in a basin, Antarctica is a continent surrounded by open ocean. Since its sea ice is unconfined, it is particularly sensitive to changes in the winds. As noted by the National Snow and Ice Data Center, some research has suggested that changes in Antarctic sea ice are caused in part by a strengthening of the westerly winds that flow unhindered in a circle above the Southern Ocean. "
 
Last edited:
ok. and ? what is this suppose to prove ? again, as i told you in the other topic. step up your level of acknowledgement of this whole subject.
Well, it proves, that this topic is not reported by the mainstream media, as they prefer to ignore record levels of ice, in favor of ratings.
 
Well, it proves, that this topic is not reported by the mainstream media, as they prefer to ignore record levels of ice, in favor of ratings.
i guess you did not understand this part of your own link,
" Geography and winds are thought to be especially important. Unlike the Arctic, where sea ice is confined in a basin, Antarctica is a continent surrounded by open ocean. Since its sea ice is unconfined, it is particularly sensitive to changes in the winds. As noted by the National Snow and Ice Data Center, someresearch has suggested that changes in Antarctic sea ice are caused in part by a strengthening of the westerly winds that flow unhindered in a circle above the Southern Ocean. "
 
i guess you did not understand this part of your own link,
" Geography and winds are thought to be especially important. Unlike the Arctic, where sea ice is confined in a basin, Antarctica is a continent surrounded by open ocean. Since its sea ice is unconfined, it is particularly sensitive to changes in the winds. As noted by the National Snow and Ice Data Center, someresearch has suggested that changes in Antarctic sea ice are caused in part by a strengthening of the westerly winds that flow unhindered in a circle above the Southern Ocean. "
The mainstream media reported, that global warming caused a huge chunk to break off the Antarctic ice sheet. Reality is that when the ice sheet gets too big, it can not withstand tidal fluctuations, and eventually it breaks off, because it can not support it's own tremendous weight. When this happened, no one was yet told that sea ice levels in Antarctica were actually expanding

r
 
The mainstream media reported, that global warming caused a huge chunk to break off the Antarctic ice sheet. Reality is that when the ice sheet gets too big, it can not withstand tidal fluctuations, and eventually it breaks off, because it can not support it's own tremendous weight. When this happened, no one was yet told that sea ice levels in Antarctica were actually expanding

r
first, part of your problem is this " mainstream media ".
second, what is this suppose to prove ?
Reality is that when the ice sheet gets too big, it can not withstand tidal fluctuations,and eventually it breaks off, because it can not support it's own tremendous weight
so how would there be a snowball earth and equilibrium, like you mentioned ?
When this happened, no one was yet told that sea ice levels in Antarctica were actually expanding
they're expanding or is it that part of your link that i pointed out ?
 
first, part of your problem is this " mainstream media ".
second, what is this suppose to prove ?

so how would there be a snowball earth and equilibrium, like you mentioned ?

they're expanding or is it that part of your link that i pointed out ?

You might Google mainstream media, if you do not understand the term, and as for snowball Earth, yes indeed, if this continued, we could not exist, so we really need to be VERY VERY HAPPY about global warming, as every advancement of mankind has happened after the warming began, and for the current equilibrium.

Can you dispute this too?
 
You might Google mainstream media, if you do not understand the term, and as for snowball Earth, yes indeed, if this continued, we could not exist, so we really need to be VERY VERY HAPPY about global warming, as every advancement of mankind has happened after the warming began, and for the current equilibrium.

Can you dispute this too?
well, i'm wondering what the hell this rambling pertains to.
if you understood what i said, then maybe there would be something to dispute.
 
well, i'm wondering what the hell this rambling pertains to.
if you understood what i said, then maybe there would be something to dispute.

I am under no responsibility, to understand what you say. But I respect your right to not be understood by myself.

Again, climate change has been in effect, for the entire age of the Earth, and the current warming trend has been in effect, since the height of the last ice age, and all of mans achievements have happened during this warming period. So thank God for global warming.
 
I am under no responsibility, to understand what you say. But I respect your right to not be understood by myself.

Again, climate change has been in effect, for the entire age of the Earth, and the current warming trend has been in effect, since the height of the last ice age, and all of mans achievements have happened during this warming period. So thank God for global warming.
i think you are alpher bethe gamow.
 
Reality is that when the ice sheet gets too big, it can not withstand tidal fluctuations, and eventually it breaks off, because it can not support it's own tremendous weight
- - - -
CO2 has been rising for the last 18 years, and there has been no global warming during this period,
- - - -
and the current warming trend has been in effect, since the height of the last ice age,
- - - -
None of that is even close to reality. It's all just wrong, contrary to physical fact - like your goofy notion that the sea ice in Antarctica somehow contradicts the global warming models that predicted it.

Apparently your problem is you have no accurate information on this topic - Where are you getting all this nonsense?
 
None of that is even close to reality. It's all just wrong, contrary to physical fact. Apparently your problem is you have no accurate information on this topic - Where are you getting all this nonsense?
Sea ice sheets break off when their thickness can not support their size in a fluctuating ocean, you do know that oceans are always moving.

CO2 has been rising steadily, and the IPCC has admitted what they call a stall in global warming during this period, feel free to Google it.

20,000 years ago, there was an ice sheet down to NJ in North America, this has been melting for 20,000 years.

Why is it that you do not know these things? this is what you must ask yourself, and why is it, that you can not hear the grasshopper at your feet.
 
Back
Top