*************
M*W: That depends on who's listening. If you're talking to a christian, they already have pre-set boundaries of what they're willing to hear (Note: I did not say 'believe'). So, most of the time, anything anyone of any level of knowledge will fall on deaf christian ears.
Those who are more inclined to read and research will listen with open ears, and hopefully discuss and share knowledge.
Some atheists, on the other hand, don't want to discuss religious matters, simply because they're not interested and even coming from another atheist can fall on deaf atheist ears.
If I want to make a point, depending on who's listening, I use a combination of the works of legitimate scholars and what I glean for myself if it applies. I don't usually come up with my own theories, but if I feel what I'm thinking applies to other scholarly research, then I'll express it.
I love to read and research. I've learned a lot, and I would like to share it, especially to those who turn a deaf ear. I believe they are the ones who would benefit most from what I have to say. I love the discussions. It doesn't really matter who is right or wrong. I respect those individuals more who will at least listen whether they end up agreeing or not. I think it's said when some refuse to listen, because they show they are close-minded. I was like them at one time, so I understand where they're coming from. I am truly thankful I listened when I did.
Regarding believing what science can prove, I am an advocate for evidence based knowledge. Because I'm in the medical field, science has special meaning to me. I want to know how good medicine comes to be and how we can eliminate bad medicine. I respect biblical scholars and archeologists for the training they've had and for the work they do. They don't necessarily set out to prove this or prove that, they set out to find out what the truth is to their findings, regardless of which way it turns out. They don't conclude such things as did Jesus exist or did the Exodus really happen. They take the tangible evidence (if any) and base their conclusions on the science behind the artifacts they study.
I don't usually form my own opinion from one scholar saying this or the other scholar saying that. I prefer to read everything I can find and base my opinions on what seems logical to me. Sometimes I may be right, and sometimes I may be wrong, but I never stop searching. I believe there are just some things that have been handed down to us that we best not take at face value. I just don't have that kind of naive faith. I need to have it proven to me with evidence.
I agree with your philosophy on debating. That is why I dont use scripture to lend authority to my arguments most of the time here because it has no authority in the minds of most people here so it would be nonsense, even though I believe it is truth. I really do understand your frustration with Christians, honestly I do, I think it is rediculous the way we act sometimes. I really do apologize for that. The truth is we do what makes sense to us. That is not debatable. Jesus Christ makes sense to me so that is the way I will look at things, so is it neccessary for people to lash out at me. I do not lash out with harsh words or derrogatory remarks because they believe different. You say it does not make a difference who is right or wrong but it does. The ideas discussed here make up the foundations of our world so is there any moral obligation? Of course that is why you have a need to want to teach people, right? In your heart of hearts I really do think you believe it matters. And to address you stating "I just don't have that kind of naive faith. I need to have it proven to me with evidence." At some point in time there is no evidence and you have to believe a report from someone. You are in medicine so tell me if someone says that they are in pain you have to believe them, because that is your only way of knowing.
Thank you,
His son,
><>Warrior61<><