"Christianism"?

TruthSeeker

TruthSeeker

Fancy Virtual Reality Monkey
Valued Senior Member
sandy said:
I hope border patrol catch these parasites and fry their @sses.
Click to expand...

This post: http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1444624&postcount=665


So... she claims she is a "Christian". Is that how Christians behave? If so, can they really call themselves Chiristians? After all, Jesus said:

"John 13:35
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."

...and...

"1 John 3-6
3 We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands. 4 The man who says, "I know him," but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But if anyone obeys his word, God's love is truly made complete in him. This is how we know we are in him: 6 Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did. "


This is what Jesus would say to sandy....

"And now I plead with you, lady, not as though I wrote a new commandment to you, but that which we have had from the beginning: that we love one another."
-- 2 John 1:5


Why are there so many "Chirstians" like sandy? Are they the ones who the Bible warns us about? The ones who are from babylon? Who claim to follow God but lead people astray instead? The wolf disguised as sheep? Is that what fundamentalist Christianism is all about?

Discuss.
 
Because people do not read the Bible as searchers for the truth, they decide truth first, then read it as lawyers looking for loopholes to justify their truth and condemn others.

Don't get me wrong, I think people SHOULD decide their own truths, but then, when they try and justify that dishonestly with the Bible, that's when they become hypocrites.

I think maybe it is the social pressure and need to conform to Christianity that does it.
People learn that if you are against God and Jesus, then you are evil and wrong, so they try and find ways to live their lives they want to, and still be able to wear that badge.
 
Another scripture to destify the foolishness of that woman.


"1 John 9-11
9 Anyone who claims to be in the light but hates his brother is still in the darkness. 10 Whoever loves his brother lives in the light, and there is nothing in him[c] to make him stumble. 11 But whoever hates his brother is in the darkness and walks around in the darkness; he does not know where he is going, because the darkness has blinded him. "
 
one_raven said:
Because people do not read the Bible as searchers for the truth, they decide truth first, then read it as lawyers looking for loopholes to justify their truth and condemn others.
Click to expand...
True. Sad, isn't it? :(

People learn that if you are against God and Jesus, then you are evil and wrong, so they try and find ways to live their lives they want to, and still be able to wear that badge.
Click to expand...
I absolutely cannot stand such lack of integrity. It's so incredibly frustrating to see such thing in this planet......
 
Are you seriously saying that preventing illegal immigration is anti-christian? St. Paul himself appealed to the Emperor based on his Roman citizenship. Citizenship he wouldn't have had, if he was for letting all the illegals into the Empire.
 
John J. Bannan said:
Citizenship he wouldn't have had, if he was for letting all the illegals into the Empire.
Click to expand...
"Letting the illegals into the Empire"??
Where the hell do you get this?

Rome wanted every person to be part of the Empire.
When they conquered a city, they brought all the people who survived into the Roman fold.
They were trying to conquer the world - a world that would have a single government and no such thing as national borders.


Regardless, Jesus preached equality and compassion for all people.
 
TruthSeeker said:
This post: http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1444624&postcount=665


So... she claims she is a "Christian". Is that how Christians behave? If so, can they really call themselves Chiristians? After all, Jesus said:

"John 13:35
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."

...and...

"1 John 3-6
3 We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands. 4 The man who says, "I know him," but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But if anyone obeys his word, God's love is truly made complete in him. This is how we know we are in him: 6 Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did. "


This is what Jesus would say to sandy....

"And now I plead with you, lady, not as though I wrote a new commandment to you, but that which we have had from the beginning: that we love one another."
-- 2 John 1:5


Why are there so many "Chirstians" like sandy? Are they the ones who the Bible warns us about? The ones who are from babylon? Who claim to follow God but lead people astray instead? The wolf disguised as sheep? Is that what fundamentalist Christianism is all about?

Discuss.
Click to expand...


Christians are like everyone dummy. Being ignorant is not something to be proud of, do you know that?
 
Since in essence those who believe in orthodox Christianity are the permanently credulous, then they also tend to be easily fooled by certain political ideologies. It isn't even Christianity itself that fuels their attitudes, it's just the status quo, going with the crowd, a mob mentality that's afraid to grasp the real implications of Jesus' revolutionary thought.
 
First Century Rome certainly did not want every person to be part of the Empire. The peoples they conquered were killed or became slaves, i.e. booty. Roman citizenship was a valuable privilege - not given away lightly. Rome also conquered to exploit and steal the wealth of neighbors, as well as to demonstrate the power of the Emporer to his rivals. Roman citizenship was far more valuable than American citizenship.
Jesus did not advocate violation of Roman law. He said give to Ceasar what is Ceasar's - and to God what is God's. Jesus would not have said America must open its borders and allow in all comers despite our laws.
 
John J. Bannan said:
First Century Rome certainly did not want every person to be part of the Empire. The peoples they conquered were killed or became slaves, i.e. booty. Roman citizenship was a valuable privilege - not given away lightly. Rome also conquered to exploit and steal the wealth of neighbors, as well as to demonstrate the power of the Emporer to his rivals. Roman citizenship was far more valuable than American citizenship.
Jesus did not advocate violation of Roman law. He said give to Ceasar what is Ceasar's - and to God what is God's. Jesus would not have said America must open its borders and allow in all comers despite our laws.
Click to expand...

I dont know what your trying to say John. The Roman empire had a desire to survive, like everything else. After Rome was built it would have lasted what maybe a year or even five years before annihilation?

This is from a link i found:

In some parts of the empire the Romans met resistance from local tribes. Although the upper classes of the conquered areas usually adjusted to the Roman way of life, conquered people were generally allowed to continue living as they had before the Romans came to power. As a result, a mixture of Roman and native culture existed in many regions. Since the Roman religious system was polytheistic, it could easily accommodate any Gods whom the natives revered. Christianity however, being monotheistic, was not acceptable.
Click to expand...

Those shows on T.V are not accurate at all.
 
John J. Bannan said:
Are you seriously saying that preventing illegal immigration is anti-christian? St. Paul himself appealed to the Emperor based on his Roman citizenship. Citizenship he wouldn't have had, if he was for letting all the illegals into the Empire.
Click to expand...
What does that have to do with Christianism? :bugeye:

What she said is anti-christian. That's what this thread is about. Stay on topic, please...:bugeye:
 
John99 said:
Christians are like everyone dummy. Being ignorant is not something to be proud of, do you know that?
Click to expand...
I'm so ignorant I accurately pointed out she does not behave like what Jesus would call a "Christian"... :rolleyes:

You are obviously the one being ignorant here. So if I were you, I would quietly leave the room or say something intelligent, FAST! :D
 
spidergoat said:
Since in essence those who believe in orthodox Christianity are the permanently credulous, then they also tend to be easily fooled by certain political ideologies. It isn't even Christianity itself that fuels their attitudes, it's just the status quo, going with the crowd, a mob mentality that's afraid to grasp the real implications of Jesus' revolutionary thought.
Click to expand...

Nice avatar.
 
So whats wrong with what she said? Who said she doesn't love them? If she did not love them then that would be a violation but if she does she hasn't violated anything. Please explain what wrong has been done.

Thank you, His Son,
><>Warrior61<><
 
So... she wishes them to get "their asses fried" and that's ok? Nothing wrong with that? Oh yeah! SOunds very loving to me! :rolleyes:

Oh please! What's the difference between getting asses fried or heads beheaded? I mean... not much eh? :rolleyes:
 
TruthSeeker said:
So... she wishes them to get "their asses fried" and that's ok? Nothing wrong with that? Oh yeah! SOunds very loving to me! :rolleyes:

Oh please! What's the difference between getting asses fried or heads beheaded? I mean... not much eh? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

youve lost your marbles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top