Yea, but I didn't think he meant it literally..
What worries me is that, now that I know he did mean it literally, he seems to be saying that believers exist in another parallel universe than non-believers
what if your a buddhist?
Yea, but I didn't think he meant it literally..
What worries me is that, now that I know he did mean it literally, he seems to be saying that believers exist in another parallel universe than non-believers
Enmos said:Well, how is anyone ever going to start to believe in Him to begin with if you are right ?
Start at the very beginning please..
what if your a buddhist?
The fate of believers is affected by God who is in communication with the believers. God can affect the non-believers through the believers, and still not exist to the non-believers.
God exists to the believer, but disappears if the believer becomes an atheist. What's so illogical?
So he can't affect the non-believers directly ? What does that mean for his supposed omnipotency ?
No. Believers and non-believers exist in the same universe. However, God being omnipotent can cease to exist for some people in our universe and exist for others in the same universe. The parallel universe analogy was only to point out that science may come to accept the idea of two things both existing, but not existing with relation to each other.
things dont cease to exist just because you dont belive in them.
Why don't you tell me - you seem to think you know the answer.
If God wills his non-existence to the non-believer, it says nothing about His omnipotency. If anything, it points out his omnipotency. I am not saying God has no choice in the matter. If God had no choice, than that would lessen his omnipotency.
He is omnipotent.