RJ: don't pay any attention to this. It's smoke and mirrors. Kruskal Szekeres coordinates are nonsense. Imagine I had a clock that was going slower and slower and slower. Then imagine I "defined" some new time coordinate such that one second was one tick of that clock. That's effectively what Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates do. Guys like pryzk end up thinking you can put a stopped observer in front of a stopped clock, and the observer sees it ticking as normal. Then he'll throw a load of equations at you and try to blind you with maths. Look at his first line: For points inside the event horizon. There are no points inside the event horizon. It takes forever to cross the event horizon. We've been through this before. See the diagram on the left. The infalling observer goes to the end of time and back, and is in two places at once. It's garbage. It is total tosh.
But don't let this persuade you that black holes don't exist. They do. They just aren't like what people say they're like.
That choice of coordinates is nonsense? If you think Kruskal Szekeres Coordinates [metric] is nonsense then you think the Field Equations are nonsense. You're nonsense and you couldn't figure how metric equations work if your life depended on it. You don't have a clue yet you think you do. Intellectual dishonest farsight.
Guys like pryzk know what they're talking about. You don't.
Last edited: