Algebra alone only describes your framework. To make a model fit reality, you need fundamental constants, and they are numbers.
Black Holes are in the theory of everything.
- Thread starter Pincho Paxton
- Start date
Algebra alone only describes your framework. To make a model fit reality, you need fundamental constants, and they are numbers.
OK, so you clearly are deranged. A 'sentient computer program' eh?
'Hello World' is not self aware.
Yay! I've figured out an experiment that you can actually try out!!! 
In the Two Slit Experiment I think that people are underestimating the light reflecting back off the Kodak Paper. It creates a wind. Like a mirror is the perfect balance of that wind. But the Kodak Paper still has some wind from the vortex. I need to re-evaluate the Aether absorption, and add the vortex wind on top of that. As a photon hits the paper it is opening up a new black hole each time, with a vortex coming out of it.
I know how to prove it. Burn a circle into the paper with photons before the experiment. And then perform the experiment on that paper, look at the new pattern.
In the Two Slit Experiment I think that people are underestimating the light reflecting back off the Kodak Paper. It creates a wind. Like a mirror is the perfect balance of that wind. But the Kodak Paper still has some wind from the vortex. I need to re-evaluate the Aether absorption, and add the vortex wind on top of that. As a photon hits the paper it is opening up a new black hole each time, with a vortex coming out of it.
I know how to prove it. Burn a circle into the paper with photons before the experiment. And then perform the experiment on that paper, look at the new pattern.
Yay! I've figured out an experiment that you can actually try out!!!
In the Two Slit Experiment I think that people are underestimating the light reflecting back off the Kodak Paper. It creates a wind. Like a mirror is the perfect balance of that wind. But the Kodak Paper still has some wind from the vortex. I need to re-evaluate the Aether absorption, and add the vortex wind on top of that. As a photon hits the paper it is opening up a new black hole each time, with a vortex coming out of it.
I know how to prove it. Burn a circle into the paper with photons before the experiment. And then perform the experiment on that paper, look at the new pattern.
You know your words make as much sense as trying to run an Amiga coded program in a win32 environment with no emulators being used.
What I'm trying to say is that "you as the observer" know what you are trying to say, or describe, so it makes perfect sense to you. However everybody else doesn't see from your observational perspective, so the word soup will mean nothing to them.
This is one of the major reasons why it's important to be able to clearly communicate in any walk of life, as without decent communication, there is a beakdown in understanding.
All atoms contain Black Holes. The Kodak Paper contains sealed Black holes. As each photon hits the paper it opens up a new Black Hole. The Black hole has a Vortex just like any other huge black hole. The vortex is very low emission, but has just enough emission to push the photons left, and right.
Put a circle in the paper with photons, and you will get a circular spray of emissions. This will create a doughnut spread of hits on the Kodak paper.
The experiment is not done with Kodak paper only. It's been done with many different kinds of screens.
Trolling.
You need to be in a room and have people in white coats talk to you but not in the way you think.
PP is clearly trolling. If he believed the bull he peddles he'd have come up with stuff over a long period of time. Instead he posts a new and more outrageous claim claim every time he posts, trying to get a rise out of people. People in pseudo don't give much justification for their claims but he's just taking the piss.
All screens contain Black Holes.. all atoms contain Black Holes.. please read again.
To call this trolling is calling for the thread to be closed. I don't think that it is any more akin to trolling than the posts by people who will not address what he says. PP, are you saying for example that there is some aether that moves in and out of matter that will cause the slit experiments to give misleading results when viewed within our current understanding of physics? Are you saying that there is some aspect of nature that plays by rules that science has not yet be able to explain? What exactly is the point were the existing understanding of physics and the new physics converge?
I'm covering Black Holes with NEGATIVE MASS, and how to build an atom from that seed. I know how to build an atom without smashing it to bits. Well really I'm covering everything.. I have hundreds of answers. Sorry yeah the Aether is there.
OK, so do you deny you are trolling? Answer questions then.
The Aether has a small effect on the experiment, combined with the vortex coming from the atoms that have been blasted. I don't know if I'm using the right word, the emission shooting out of the Black Hole centre blows the photon out of the way, and also expands the Aether.
Last edited:
Not my puppy
Registered Senior Member
Oops.
Last edited:
Thank you.
So there are two effects that are not accounted for by existing physics: The aether which has a small effect and the vortex effect. Let me ask you about the vortex effect. Please bear with me if you have already explained this but I haven't been paying close attention. This black hole center, where is that located and is there one or are there many in play?
It depends on the Atom. A hydrogen Atom is the easiest to go with, because it is a simple pattern. But other atoms have more than 1 black hole. It's hard enough for me to visualise the Hydrogen atom, I'm not going to work out the rest. That takes some real computation.
OK, we can work with the Hydrogen atom. Is this black hole that is within the hydrogen atom the same kind of structure that is commonly referred to as residing at the center of galaxies and as the remnant of collapsed stars? If so, how does a black hole get in the atom?
A combination of the Kissing Problem, and the Black Hole that created the Galaxy by firing Particles around the rotating disk. The Sun is a Black Hole, its vortex has folded over into a sphere, because its size, and spin are just right to balance the Vortex. Aether becomes a Black hole when it is reduced beyond its minimum scale. So when two aether bubbles are forced into one another, a process inside them of balanced scaling takes place. They try to share the same mathematical area as each other. but one of the bubbles turns negative, and the other becomes positive. They scale accordingly.
Last edited:
Your trolling ... LOL, just kidding. You didn't answer my question unless when you said, "Aether becomes a Black hole when it is reduced beyond its minimum scale" was your answer to my question about how a black hole got inside the atom. Are you saying that the atom and its internal black hole is formed from the aether and represents to minimum scale of black holes?
The Aether becomes negative scale, and inverts itself. It turns inside out inside the Atom. Now all of its forces are reversed.
So the aether represents a mid point on the scale and black holes inside atoms are negative scale. Then what structure represents positive scale if atoms are negative scale?