Birth of Earth

I rely upon Herndon as the go to name here: http://nuclearplanet.com/

"For the past 50 years or so, scientists have been talking about dust condensing at low pressures and gradually becoming pebbles, then boulders, etc. and building planets. While that process goes on to some extent, it would lead to oxidized planets without massive cores. I think in the main the planets rained out of the centers of giant gaseous protoplanets, which would account for their massive cores and, in the case of Earth, for her two component surface."

http://knol.google.com/k/j-marvin-herndon/understanding-galaxies-and-galactic/1x8elf7fue7ro/2#

***

For pure speculation and crystal ball techniques there is of course the so-called mainstream "scientific" community:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11539122

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/293/5532/1127

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1402-4896/2008/T130/014021

http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2008/0401-discovering_a_new_earth_430_light_years_away.htm

***

And some interpretations of observations are here:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080402202055.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080226160017.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071114203718.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070108093817.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/10/041019082930.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/12/041210083158.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/12/041206193555.htm
 
Last edited:
He wants a different forum where he can try to convince other people of his wacky ideas.
 
jsispat said:
i need discussion group on the topic of earth formation.
Click to expand...
If only to spread your nonsense, I doubt there is real need for other groups; We will beat you up here all any masoquist can stand. :D

Other groups tend to have some knowledgable people too, so you might as well stay here; but you and OilIsMastery could start your own, filled with praise for the other's POV.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i have such a fine example that Earth going explode: It is piece of molded toast, with hole near center representing the sun and several seeds clearly in orbital positons, like the planets about that hole. The third out from the hole has ruptured (when it is was toasted I think) - What more proof do you need? :shrug:
 
i have such a fine example that earth is like mouldy orange. earth has subduction zones same mouldy orange has same subduction zones. such a fine example. see below picture with ice cool mind only

orangesubduction.png
 
Xelios said:
i have such a fine example that earth is like mouldy orange. earth has subduction zones same mouldy orange has same subduction zones. such a fine example. see below picture with ice cool mind only

orangesubduction.png
Click to expand...

honestly not clear like my evidence. if anyone realy want to see earth formation go to saw mill spent one hour there. every thing will be clear.
 
jsispat said:
honestly not clear like my evidence. if anyone realy want to see earth formation go to saw mill spent one hour there. every thing will be clear.
Click to expand...

That's just as silly as everything else you've said. We have ALL seen cross-sections of logs (I myself have cut down many trees and have seen plenty of them) and that does nothing to support your idiotic fantasy.:bugeye:
 
OilIsMastery said:
And unicorns.
Click to expand...
Not now. They were dumb as you and got sucked into the subductions to slowly become oil.
God knows, the Earth must have had half a zillion unicorns to make all the oil already extracted. :p
 
Xelios said:
i have such a fine example that earth is like mouldy orange. earth has subduction zones same mouldy orange has same subduction zones. such a fine example. see below picture with ice cool mind only

orangesubduction.png
Click to expand...
but both has logic and both has same biological growth
 
my theory is correct only problem is it is very different and no body intiate to think about it.
 
Read-Only said:
That's just as silly as everything else you've said. We have ALL seen cross-sections of logs (I myself have cut down many trees and have seen plenty of them) and that does nothing to support your idiotic fantasy.:bugeye:
Click to expand...

i can not understand what you were finding in log of tree. when i have sent you many snaps of crust and core,subduction zone,lava ebrupting from log .black black plates in core etc.that all are matching with structure of earth.
all these evidences are available in all log of tree.
 
Read-Only said:
That's just as silly as everything else you've said. We have ALL seen cross-sections of logs (I myself have cut down many trees and have seen plenty of them) and that does nothing to support your idiotic fantasy.:bugeye:
Click to expand...

i can not understand what you were finding in log of tree. when i have sent you many snaps of crust and core,subduction zone,lava ebrupting from log .black black plates in core etc.that all are matching with structure of earth.
all these evidences are available in all log of tree.
 
sureshbansal said:
i worked hard on birth of earth and reach to conclusion reg birth of earth.
1. all meteroids and asteroids are seed of planets after germination some seed converts in big planets and here universe is soil of that seeds where thet are germinating in.
i hope this my theory will suit to all geologist searching on it.if you are still not satisfy with my theory pls tell me good sites where i can lauch my discovery.waiting serious reply
thanks
regs
suresh bansal
Click to expand...

Looking at the sky and imagining how the earth was formed belongs in science fiction, not science. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top