Oh, don't I know it
You need not tell me about the wacky theists. In general--that is, beyond Sciforums--that's why I have no religion. I have a sense of the Universe, various myths do help put it in order, and the sum result of God becomes so inoffensive that it isn't worth the quest to find another word. I came across "All-in-All" in a Sufi article I was reading, but that makes me shiver and think of
Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps. While they're damn fine soaps, the
labels are at once amusing, enlightening, and downright scary.
But I do accuse you of a specific prejudice. It is just as difficult at Sciforums to get any rationality out of most atheists. I tend to think of it as a human problem, and not one we can restrict to labels.
Incidentally, it's Microsoft. Everybody, including them, knows that they're over. When OSX came out, Microsoft didn't even try insofar as IE was concerned; they gave at the Office, so to speak. MIE for OSX is a port; it's just OS9's Internet Explorer carbonized to X. It even displays the wrong cursor-timer when transferring data. We Mac users may have been frustrated with Adobe for taking so long with Photoshop, but we got a Cocoa build out of it.
What's up with the lack of floppy disks?
Well, Microsoft just botched .NET.
Mac users generally don't need floppy disks. We use networks. Please understand, they're
designed to operate that way.
As to your crashes--it must be a user error or a lack of updates. Apple cannot be held responsible if a user doesn't wish to patch their applications. They extend great effort to make sure your system is updated; it takes a conscious effort on the user's part to screw that up.
Mac is more than an OS. It's more than a computer. It's an
idea. That's what Windows users generally fail to remember. I don't think Apple has ever claimed otherwise.
The value of the idea: Watch what people do when they love their computers. Apple just released the Sherlock 3 DSK; things should be getting even more fun by spring when the first fruits are harvested.
Really, it is too bad about .NET. That's what happens when you try to be first, and not best.
Incidentally, I get a showdown with XP tomorrow. I have to go fix a friend's system. I have no idea what's wrong, and my initial user impression of it was that it was so anemic a caricature of an operating system that I would rather avoid it. Perhaps my impression will change. I have no idea what I will be looking at whatsoever; of course, that's the thing. It took less than five minutes before I could move fluidly through OSX. On the one hand, that's part of why I don't understand what the hell you or your IT did to that computer. (If you or they treated it like a Windows machine and expected to use it as such, A- that's the problem, and B-you expended way too much effort. It's easier, more fluid, and the more you tamper with it, the worse you'll screw it up; they're
designed to give it their best--unlike a Windows machine, you don't have to coax it out.) To the other, if XP is that easy to use and fix, I'll consider it a lesson learned. Of course, they
were inspired by the best.
thanx,
Tiassa