After all, (Q) met the God he believed in...
That is a lie. I've met no gods.
After all, (Q) met the God he believed in...
Me paranoid? The fact that 3/4 of the worlds population are as insane as you and Sam?
Nah.
One mans dogma is another mans innovation, you seem very close minded in exploring anything outside your bubble. Are you afraid or something?
You're asking if I'm afraid to share your mental disorders? Of course not, it's only when you start believing your delusions are reality.
Wait a minute...
More like 90%. Have you considered getting off?
Maybe he is. After all, (Q) met the God he believed in since he rejects the one Lori believes in. After all, just because we assume there is an objective reality common to all does not necessarily make it anything more than a useful assumption/
People can gain plenty of experience by watching mistakes other people make without having to make the mistakes themselves.
Me paranoid? The fact that 3/4 of the worlds population are as insane as you and Sam?
Nah.
(Q):
I don't think that is actually true. You spend all your time on sciforums arguing with those you assure us you do not wish to share space with. The evidence refutes your claim. You'd be lost without theists.
How would you decide what is a mistake?
Well, if is see a person get burned at the stake, I would think getting into that sitution would be a mistake.
So I have a learning experience without having to make that mistake myself.
yeah, either way you look at it, you're pretty much screwed.
So you would avoid situations that threaten your life. Like being a healer in a society where educated women are considered abnormal
Survival instincts are there for a reason. If a doctor goes into the jungle to help those without a doctor and ends up dead then nobody wins.
People can gain plenty of experience by watching mistakes other people make without having to make the mistakes themselves.
yeah, either way you look at it, you're pretty much screwed.
i'm not debating. i'm just discussing.
maybe that's the problem!
i have no desire to debate about my experiences. i find it kind of offensive when people think that my life and experiences and perceptions of them are even up for debate. i find that arrogant.
That's why science is so powerful, it does not depend on the authority of an individual.
Well it's an important distinction. I have religious and Christian friends, and I respect their experiences. However, none of them can point to anything that would convince a disinterested party that God exists. I think an important part of public discourse is examining the evidence on both sides, not just feelings. That's why science is so powerful, it does not depend on the authority of an individual.
i suppose more than one person can experience something together that may be evidence for them both at the same time, but...that's not to say it would mean the same thing to both of them. most of the substantiation comes in a meaning that is personal