Not quite, since they are not looking for consent, and neither are atheists with their perspective. In both cases it is an ego trip - the pleasure of feeling "right" and "superior" when confronting others with something about which they are entrenched and convinced.
Damnit. I posted something meaningful.
I swear, I tried not to. Don't hate me because I'm beautiful.
Isn't Herr pi's an STD?Herr pi?
Coleslaw.Isn't Herr pi's an STD?
Yup. And I have argued several times before on these forums; true altruism is not possible. Why would someone do something for another at some cost to themselves? No other reason than it provides them some degree of satisfaction - i.e. pleasure.t what about the moral certitude that they've done something good (salvation for another human being)? That's probably expressed as ego also; but then again, isn't every altruistic action then also a maneuver of the ego?
A moment of pure satisfaction. The theist would expect a reward of course which significantly devalues their potentially noble action. For an atheist - it would be as near to true altruism as any person can imagine.What pleasure does one derive from dying to save another?
I'd think that particular moment could be so short as to be unnoticeable: sandwiched somewhere between "I've got to help! What should I do?" and "Oh shit, I'm dead."A moment of pure satisfaction.