Free will.
That ought to be a problem..
Why worry about that now? :shrug: I'd think that research is going along the lines of what I stated instead of trying to develop a human like machine that has feelings and such.
Free will.
That ought to be a problem..
No, not yet. Maybe not ever.But CAN you develop such machines?
When it reacts intelligently and with insight to unexpected situations, like humans do, I think it can be classified as sentient.A great problem as well is, how do you know if it's self aware or sentient?
If you can relate yourself to the environment and vice versa, that is self-awareness.No, because how do you know if it's truly self aware, or if it's simply an intelligent machine?
There is no difference..It's the same issue with animals. How do you know they are self aware or if they are chemical reactions?
Yes. But my point is, you can program a robot to act self aware, it doesn't mean it is.If you can relate yourself to the environment and vice versa, that is self-awareness.
There is no difference..
That's why I said:Yes. But my point is, you can program a robot to act self aware, it doesn't mean it is.
Special reactions are non-existent. Any reaction is just that, a reaction.There is entirely a difference. Of course, self awareness in itself is a reaction, but a special one and important one. Without it, life has no point, and is no more valuable than a rock, because it does not value ITSELF.
That's why I said:
"When it reacts intelligently and with insight to unexpected situations, like humans do, I think it can be classified as sentient."
You cannot program insight.
Special reactions are non-existent. Any reaction is just that, a reaction.
That you find it special is a different matter. Needless to say what you value (or any person) is not objective..
My chat with Alice just now:
Human: what is god?
ALICE: I think of God as a "Who" not a "What.".
Human: who is god, then?
ALICE: he is master of the universe.
Human: which universe?
ALICE: The last one, I think.
Human: how many universe are there?
ALICE: About one million.
lol
The continuation of the chat:
Human: what are the names?
ALICE: I don't know who. .
Human: who creates universe?
ALICE: Marilyn Monroe. .
Human: who creates Marilyn Monroe?
ALICE: Mary Shelley. .
Human: Who the hell is Mary Shelley?
The connection has timed out
'Rare' is not the same as 'special'. 'Special' has a component of value, 'rare' doesn't.It's special in its rarity and complexity.
I agree that it's difficult, but I think making it self-aware is more difficult than figuring out if it worked.But meh, I think the most difficult part of making self aware machines is figuring out how to tell if they're self aware.
Value is a subjective. Something that has value to you may have no value whatsoever to anyone else.Still, it is rare and to us Humans, rarity usually implies value.
Retarded if you ask me.. lolNow, those chat bots are interesting but not very smart at all.
I think we all find intelligent life more valuable than simple life.
What exactly is this soul you are talking about ?
No, because how do you know if it's truly self aware, or if it's simply an intelligent machine? It's the same issue with animals. How do you know they are self aware or if they are chemical reactions?
Your believe in the existence of the soul is based on interpretations of some ancient cave scribblings ?it's some kind of ethereal body. and you can't be alive if you don't have it. i don't really know much about it because i'm just a materialistic human like you... but i trust the ancient people.