Ok. What is a prophecy? Please put it so that a simple engineer can understand. Thanks.It's only arbitary if you don't know what a prophecy is.
I know what the accepted definition of a prophecy is, and it's a load of, umm... donky dung. I thought you might have some less smelly insight into the real meaning of a prophecy.You need a definition?
Allright. That combination of of sentences above there? The latin phrase non sequitur comes to mind. Symbolism almost exclusively denotes interpretation and thus a strong degree of arbitrarieness.All often use symbolism. Thus it's far from arbitrary.
Allright. That combination of of sentences above there? The latin phrase non sequitur comes to mind. Symbolism almost exclusively denotes interpretation and thus a strong degree of arbitrarieness.
This is the fundamental problem with all prophecies that I've ever seen. They can be interpreted in any number of ways and essentially made to fit almost any circumstance you choose.
Per my previous post, whithout interpretation, how do you even remotely know that this "seed" means jesus?Note...
Here Jesus is first described as the "seed". Genesis 3:15.
Then what's the use of a prophecy? I can say thus and such vague thing will happen at some unspecified time in the misty future, and it may or may not ever happen! How is this valuable in any way? Even for xians?That's true. However the purpose was to determine what was a prophecy and what is not. That's fairly simply.
The only way to know for sure is to wait untill the prophecy is fullfilled.
Why does all of this need to be couched in riddles? Why not just say "jesus" and be done with it?
Then what's the use of a prophecy? I can say thus and such vague thing will happen at some unspecified time in the misty future, and it may or may not ever happen! How is this valuable in any way? Even for xians?
If you admit that you don't know until your vague interpretation of a vague concept happens, why would you give it one shred of credence?
Ah yes. This is the root of the thing, huh? Since the biblical prophecies are directly or indirectly from god, then we trust them, yes? Of course, on who's authority to we take it that god actually exists and delivered these prophecies?Exemplified by my question above. You see it's about who creates the prophecy. Credence is the exact word I would use. If someone was not trustworty or incapable of insuring that such a utterance would be sure to come true...then what really trust could we put in it?
Ah yes. This is the root of the thing, huh? Since the biblical prophecies are directly or indirectly from god, then we trust them, yes? Of course, on who's authority to we take it that god actually exists and delivered these prophecies?
Theists, such as yourself, have the worst case of circular reasoning in recorded history! Don't you guys get dizzy?
You fooled me! And heck no. Why would I be offended?Ah...I'm not a theist. Curious...though, I'm often confused for one. If I've upset or offended you I appologize.
Ah...I'm not a theist. Curious...though, I'm often confused for one. If I've upset or offended you I appologize.
Glad we agree on something!
You do realize that this means that salvation depends on what you do, Right?
It basically says:
Do not do something, and you will not be judged. Do not do something, and you will not be condemned. Do something, and you will be forgiven. And it very clearly implies that if you do not comply, and do not do these things as described, you will be judged, and you will be condemned, and you will not be forgiven.
Am I wrong?
You do realize that this means that salvation depends on what you do, Right?
Glad we agree on something!
The cockroach? To each his own, I guess.
Ah...I'm not a theist. Curious...though, I'm often confused for one. If I've upset or offended you I appologize.
As it happens, I'd take non-existence over heaven any day of the week. I was non-existent for billions of years and I have to say, it wasn't that bad. Better than floating around for eternity getting bored of bliss.