yeah sure you call them.They will tell you the public goodness of what HAARP is, a study of Earth environment, perfectly harmless.
Call them???..do you see a phone number..
Are We in a HAARP "Earthquake War"?
- Thread starter desi
- Start date
Call them???..do you see a phone number..
And? Where does it state that the ionosphere fluctuations are causing the Earthquake, rather than being a direct product of the same motions producing said Earthquake? Let's just say your kooky ass backwards idea was actually true and ionosphere fluctuations were the cause- how on Earth would HAARP build up enough power to pull this off? Who's got 100 trillion dollars to spend on the power plants? You can't just move continents around with a little poke, y'know.
nuclear powerplant powering HAARP is a possible scenario. (8.21 GW is the capacity of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant)
link:
http://www2.jnes.go.jp/atom-db/en/general/atomic/ke02a13/info_h.html
Last edited:
Good grief!! Your piddling 8 GW of power would be like a wooden match in a windstorm compared to the amount of energy needed to move one of the Earth's plates.
Sheer science fiction - at it's worst. :bugeye:
you only need to trigger and earthquake, not to move it. Once you know the frequency needed and the power to apply just use it at specific location. Its how much energy can be outputted in time that matters the most.
By the way there had just been yet another earthquake, this time in Kyrgyzstan:
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2010-03/02/content_9526095.htm
---
Haiti Earthquake: 12 January, 2010: 7.0
Chile Earthquake: 27 February, 2010: 8.8
Kyrgyzstan Earthquake: 1 March, 2010: 6.3
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2010-03/02/content_9526095.htm
---
Haiti Earthquake: 12 January, 2010: 7.0
Chile Earthquake: 27 February, 2010: 8.8
Kyrgyzstan Earthquake: 1 March, 2010: 6.3
looks like a 5.0 according to this
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/region/Asia.php
must be something wrong with the HAARP steering mechanism
omg .. the thing has gone crazy......
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_big.php#listtop
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/region/Asia.php
must be something wrong with the HAARP steering mechanism
omg .. the thing has gone crazy......
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_big.php#listtop
As usual, your thinking is sadly incomplete. Just TRY thinking about it for a moment: If all it takes is a trigger, then it MUST have been right on the threshold of happening anyway!!
Can you not understand the simplicity of that???:shrug:
allright than the only problem with HAARP utilization is the amount of energy needed.
steering it might be a problem..
You're getting closer to the truth but still not there. As Pie just pointed out, steering/aiming would still be a major problem - as well as knowing just WHEN to apply the trigger. But even then, the amount of energy needed is still WAY above what you think it would be.
Short answer to all this is that the idea is still nonsense.
The Captain already explained to you how it benefits the Navy. He's right, in my professional (really) opinion. Is there some issue with his explanation? Or do you just have a personality disorder?
Aw, shucks
If we had the technology to solve that problem, the world would look like a completely different place. Here, this is for you, you'll probably get a kick out of it.
When they test launch an SLBM, they don't call it "atmospheric measurements", do they? Not everything the Navy does is intended to blow something up. They have ships, sailors, planes, engineers, scientists, and an enormous wealth of expertise. Why wouldn't they put those resources to good use when they're not busy fighting anyone?
drag on... you may want to bone up on phased array.
or not
or not
Trying to answer that question would probably reach the character limit for a post.
and you boned in.
Draqon, as you have shown us all here at least a hundred times over, your knowledge of things technical is about on the same level as someone who has only finished 6 years of primary education - those who never even made it to high school.
You really should do yourself a favor and spend a considerable amount of time studying such basics before even attempting to post anything remotely related to technology. Seriously!!!
Read-Only, what have I said here that is not scientific? :shrug: How have I demonstrated of having low knowledge or having low-IQ when I showed way more info and backed up my reasoning than any of you.
I do agree with you about the HAARP needing much more energy in order to be used as an earthquake causing device, but don't resort to accusation and hate on my part. I clearly given links which show that I do indeed know the subject of the topic.
The reason why I so vigorously defend the earthquake causing Sura and HAARP-like facilities is because I watched a russian program about it and it explained to me how this can be done. If you don't think that controlling the ionospheric electron density artificially will create any effect on the Earth mantel, than thats your hypothesis. I clearly showed that the two are related. The rest is up to an experiment to prove.