When you say Allah, this is for your information, just because I don't like the way you emphasize "The" word. Allah is God of all who believe in He (The One) no matter what race/religion he will take them to heaven.
are some people too old to see the truth?
- Thread starter scifes
- Start date
When you say Allah, this is for your information, just because I don't like the way you emphasize "The" word. Allah is God of all who believe in He (The One) no matter what race/religion he will take them to heaven.
Intentions, intentions.
that above is fairly understood by anyone who knows the history and writings of quran
as for the next: see for yourself
As long as you're prepared to take for granted that nobody can know everything, and therefor you should always continue to learn new things, you're never too old for new knowledge...
reality in fact and why the ONLY way to improve or perform an 'evolution' to knowledge is to absorb the works left by others and then combine it with honesty to reach the next plateau.
how do you think NEW WORDS are coined? We (mankind) creates them to summarize new benchmarks to reference.
For example; what is an electron or even an atom to moses?
can i kiss you?
the dead ones definitely
if youre alive theres still hope.
no,
its just being dishonest
if you say so,
whats a false muslim,..someone who doesnt think?
wrong
the ground isnt nothingness.
what IF theres only Deistic god,or Buddha?
to boldly go where no one went before?
hey,YOU started this silly tread,bucko
do tell!
when walking on ice..dont hop!
How did this turn into a "bash Islam" thread? It started off as a rambling disassembled flow of consciousness that could have gone in any direction, instead it decided to rip apart a faith. How dare all of you attack Islam. How many of you have read the Qu'ran? The rest of you can be seated.
And Oli- has anyone ever told you how annoying it is to have someone's post ripped apart line by line with a short, smart-assed commentary? Can you please address the post, not the words- it's more productive that way and it ends up actually getting us TO A POINT.
And Oli- has anyone ever told you how annoying it is to have someone's post ripped apart line by line with a short, smart-assed commentary? Can you please address the post, not the words- it's more productive that way and it ends up actually getting us TO A POINT.
I've already stated why I posted on a line-by line basis.
impet,
It usually takes substantially more effort to compose a comprehensive single response to a post that has multiple points. It is significantly easier and quicker to respond point by point. If we were to insist otherwise we'd see very little content posted.
This is annoying perhaps but it is still a practial practice for such forums like this. I would recommened you post your points in such a way that others can indeed tackle each point independently.
It usually takes substantially more effort to compose a comprehensive single response to a post that has multiple points. It is significantly easier and quicker to respond point by point. If we were to insist otherwise we'd see very little content posted.
This is annoying perhaps but it is still a practial practice for such forums like this. I would recommened you post your points in such a way that others can indeed tackle each point independently.
impet,
Why not? Note this is not a pro-religion forum, neither is it particularly an anti-religion forum. There are no barriers to how members discuss any issue of any religion. If you are offended by an attack on a religion then that is your problem not that of the attackers.
Oli,
I like the way you are addressing each point
I like the way you are addressing each point
No- and a matter fact it's MUCH easier to absorb someone's thoughts (via post) and post a comment than it is to break it down line by line with quick one-liners.
But then again I must pardon myself- I am college educated and see more to words than just one liners.
I tend to see a thrust of an argument and a counter-argument to that assertion... never mind- it's stuff you wouldn't understand.
BABA BOOEY!!! SHOW YOUR TITS!!!
Right?
if so many turds are in the toilet bowl... you have to fish them out one by one
And when a post consists of several different points?
There's nothing worse than reading through a long post trying to work which part of the reply refers to which part of the "question".
(Meh, okay, there's lots of things worse, but you know what I mean).
Good for you.
Try university next: like I did.
Maybe you don't see beyond the "one-liners".
Is that not worth considering?
Quite.
I'm an expert at many things.
One of them isn't making assumptions though.
Last edited:
Define "truth" clearly and explicitly.
when i was younger i didn't believe people smoke..it was illogical to me as people drinking piss..
i just couldn't explain it..yet i had to live with it..
now that i'm a bit older...
i preferred my self as before...i don't know..i was..pure?
You hate yourself because you understand more now? Someone did a number on you to convince you that comprehension is bad.
The risk with filling a gap with imagination and calling it "truth" is that it simply isn't... and if you communicate that "truth" to others then you are very likely lying.
Correct.
An atheist is someone who does not accept the assetion "god exists" as being true; therefore, your equality is very flawed.
If that were true then most of the worlds muslims wouldn't be muslim.
The logical choice depends on what you value. If it's psychological satiation then your odds of guessing the correct religion are 1 in (n) where (n) is the number of religions (and non-religions) that have existed in human history. That's the best you could do. If you value truth then you will understand exactly what 'God' is and what 'God' isn't and your choice will be of the highest possible certainty.
We have more than logic on our side. We have evidence and that defends itself with little or no effort on our part.
Then truth is exposed and anyone who values it can have it.
Correct.
I often use this subforum to probe human behavior.
ok.
Every religion has a scientific explanation for it... most of it being grounded in evolutionary psychology. What all religions lack are evidence of their paranormal claims... and it's simply because those claims are false.
See that what degrades them?
Safety from?
Probably, but you wont be able to answer any of them correctly.
I would speculate that most of us know exactly what you see and why you see it. The reverse isn't truth because you are relying on thinking and logic only. The most important component is objective evidence to ground your thinking and logic upon... and it would appear you're missing that.
Quite simply "it's" because we know how to distinguish between what exists and what doesn't.
I think you are confusing atheism with some kind of life philosophy. Atheism is when the assertion "god exists" is not accepted as truth.
In 500 million years heat will kill all life on earth. In a billion years the sun will physically absorb earth.
Incorrect. God is the result of human psychology... it's biggest influencer being the survival mechanism of Anthropomorphism.
Depending on what you mean about the "origin" of matter you may or may not be correct in that an explanation currently doesn't exist. The second half of your statement didn't quite make sense... perhaps if it was paraphrased that would help.
What question are you referring to and why does it matter whether or not an answer is presently available?
Atheism isn't something you "come up with". It is the default state of every newborn human on the planet. The rest of your statement seems to rely on some nebulous question that Islam answers. You'll have to state what that question is first.
No, he is just the second one you were able to notice and admit to.
Sure.
Its much easier to imagine you are clueless about basic biology.
What do you have against using the bathroom? :bugeye:
Of course, we are real...god is poor fantasy.
Islam is merely myth and superstition. Why would you care about it being attacked? Would you also care if we attacked Mother Goose, Aesop or Grimms fairy tales?