"Blame N.G, not me, my doctor ..... and by the way you are right, it is incredible what muslims have said on websites about christians and especially jews - most people can however not read it because it is in arabic ...... "
My point was that the "cannibalism" thing was an old bias against Christians by a variety of people, not the least of which were muslims. If you were simply trying to learn about Christianity, that would be a funny place to start. But whatever; you say you're not a fundamentalist. OK. I do concur about the horrible things being written about "kufr" on islamic fundamentalist websites - most of them come straight out of the Quran or al-Buhkari. I think MEMRI has translated some of them, so I recommend MEMRI.org.
"It is only a very short time ago, that somebody ran a thread about Muhammed being a paedophile here in sciforum - I have no problem with that - but you seem to take threads here as a personal insult ......"
No, I take them as a very strange place to begin learning about Christianity. As for Mohammed being a pedophile - he married a six-year old girl, consummated when she was nine.
Decide for yourselves.
As for the Lord of the Insane - what's up with the complaint? I logged in my position on the comments. They're extremely odd ones to make and they smell a bit bigoted. If you don't think I'm an angel, I suppose that's all right - except angels don't exist as far as I know, and I do exist.
If someone had logged in asking about the Jewish "blood libel", I'd expect people to be a bit reserved too. This is a very wierd topic, frankly.
Geoff