Abandoning any sense of objectivity and follow something based on a unyielding "faith" leaves you with no ability to make a rational and informed intelligent decision.
For that, one would first have to have "a sense of objectivity".
Abandoning any sense of objectivity and follow something based on a unyielding "faith" leaves you with no ability to make a rational and informed intelligent decision.
For that, one would first have to have "a sense of objectivity".
For a human? Yes.
To be truly objective, one would need to be omniscient. Humans are usually not omniscient, or at least they don't seem to be.
Anytime there is a unquestioning loyalty to an ideal or a system of authority you have a problem...not just with soldiers.
Well, some people have a problem then.
Whether something is a problem or not is a matter of how one sees a situation.
Sure.
The question is, "Who has the problem?"
The person who asks no questions.
Why would that be?
Asking questions is how one becomes informed about the decisions they make and or the orders they are given. :shrug:
not if you already know.
Asking questions is how one becomes informed about the decisions they make and or the orders they are given.
Asking questions to whom?
Your superiors, those around you....a book? :shrug:
I really shouldn't have to spell it out for anyone.
asking stupid questions, being a ball buster?
btw, you cant ask a book a question AND DONT believe everything you read in a book.
Yes, if that's the negative connotation you would like to use to denigrate those who would seek to find answers from more than just a single source